Shavers vs Peter

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slothrop, Jul 25, 2007.


  1. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    How does this go down?
     
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    We all know who has more power, but what this fight would come down to is who has the better chin. I think Peter stops Shavers
     
  3. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,481
    96
    Mar 11, 2005
    Actually, I have thought at length about this. Wladimir rocked Peter so Shavers would KO him clean if he connected. Pound for pound, Shavers was one of the hardest puncher ever. Shavers for the most part had a good chin, unless he got tired and then all bets were off. If Shavers caught Peter early within the first 6 rounds, KO Shavers. After 6, it is anyone's fight.
     
  4. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Shavers didn't have the sturdiest beard and so I think in a firefight Sam comes out big in this one.
     
  5. bb251

    bb251 Member Full Member

    148
    1
    Aug 15, 2006
    i'll take shavers by ud... neither guy had great stamina but i think shavers would throw more punches and he had the better skill in there too...
     
  6. Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky Hardcore......to the max! Full Member

    5,691
    6
    Jun 17, 2007
    As untechnical as Peter is I think he is actually the more technical boxer of the two, Shavers was just wild.

    Of course coming from the 1970's he receives the standard overrating that even the most mediocre heavyweights receive.

    Peter wins this by either KO in the later rounds or by UD.
     
  7. Flatlander

    Flatlander Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,481
    96
    Mar 11, 2005
    The 70s was the Golden Era, the last great decade for HWs and don't you forget it PUNK!!!! :fire
     
  8. Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky Hardcore......to the max! Full Member

    5,691
    6
    Jun 17, 2007
    I actually think the 90's were a superior decade in terms of talent.
    Superior because I think the heavyweights were superior from a technical sense and generally better all round fighters.

    We had A fighters such as Lewis/Tyson/Holyfield/Bowe
    and then a whole throng of B fighters such as Holmes/Mccall/Ibeabuchi/Tua/Morrison/Golota/Mercer etc etc

    I feel the fighters from the 90's were genuinely superior to their 70's counterparts.

    The only negative aspect of the 90's is we didn't get to see all the matches we would have wanted and not all the fighters fighting one another.
     
  9. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Shavers would destroy Peter
     
  10. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Shavers for all his Power had horrible HORRIBLE stamina hell his stamina was probablly so bad because he had so much umpth behind those punches. Anyway I dont know who wins probablly Peter cause he can take a better punch and doesnt have HORRIBLE stamina.