Nobody has said Golovkin-Nunez? :blood http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=358405&cat=boxer [yt]9oafzzMbFV4[/yt]
To be fair Lockett was a top domestic fighter that wasn't really tested at Euro never mind World level. A very good win on his record in Rhodes, then a few good ones like Blundell, Eastman & Qato. To say he is a wimp is very disrespectful for him even to take the shot against Pavlik shows he has balls. How the WBO had him as a Mando is another story though.
Gary was out of his depth and he certainly was no badass. But is there any need in calling a professional prizefighter 'a wimp'? I think that shows who the real ***** is here. You despicable fool. Run along and leave the boxing to the men, darling.
Hmm. Be that as it may, is that really the spirit of the thread? I thought it was more for world title fights that are shocking to have been arranged in the first place. Zaveck was ranked when he challenged Jackiewicz (and ultimately won) - so it's not like he was a grossly undeserving and hopelessly outclassed challenger like a Milton Nunez or Gary Lockett.
Spot on :good The gulf between Lockett and Pavlik, Jennings and Cotto were frightening. Referring to op, is Audley gettin the nod worse?
Interim WBA Middleweight to be fair who knows who the real WBA champions are there's about 6 in every division now
I don't care if I am fighting a losing battle I will never recognise an interim champion unless there is a legit reason for them being the interim champ i.e. Michael Katsidis. For me that was international 12 rounder. Fighters that claim to be champions when they are interim champions **** me off almost much as the sanctioning bodies and promoters that makes these fights for "world titles".
I thought Ricky Burns would drop a standard or 2 but this is ridiculous there should be standard you cand go below for defending world titles.