Rios vs abril was a total disgrace, rios didnt win more than 1/2 rounds from memory, also cloud vs campillo, campillo won 100%
They were the worst ones that went to the scorecards but I think the guys who had Lopez up vs Salido was corrupt ****ers. And Lopez then accused the ref of corruption. atsch
I had Pac/Bradley 7-5 Bradley, although I could see it 7-5 Pac. That was much closer than Rios/Abril or Cloud/Campillo. All but the most die hard *******s will admit that Manny pissed away at least 3-4 rounds. The others weren't nearly as close. Thankfully Salido saved boxing from another horrible hometown robbery by finishing the job. Good call for keeping it up there.
I think rounds 1-2 were close Pacquiao definitely won rounds 3 to 9 Bradley definitely won 10 And 11 and 12 were close, (Bradley was more aggressive but didn't do **** with his aggression in these 2) So anything from 7-5 to Pacquiao to 11-1 to Pacquiao is fine. Thats why it irks me when people say Marquez-Pacquiao was a robbery because there was 3 rounds that was clear Pacquiao, 4 rounds clearly Marquez other 5 close- so anything from 9-3 JMM to 8-4 Pac-Man fine. But theres no way in hell Bradley won more than 5 vs manny
The C**ts who had Rios beating Abril obviously, and anyone that says otherwise clearly hasn't watched the Rios-Abril fight, travesty
Rios abril was bad and ugas got completly jobbed. Which i dont understand because ugas was the bigger name even tho other dude was undefeated
I had it 116-112, Adamek was just the busier fighter in my opinion. Suppose I could score it 115-113 tops but I dont think it was a robbery by any means