How can none of these fights be tough, when you picked him to lose all of those fights atsch except the Brussles fight.
Please and the opponents of Cotto haven't..please...ODLH.... Castillow as what 5 years ago this year willb e 6 years ago, Hernandez even longer, Chavez in 2001... I was responding to EZE claims of Cotto and PBF competetion in the last 3 years
Floyd still has fought better comp..Hatton and Oscar are better than anyone of Cottos resume.... yes hes better then a 36 year old shane.
Hey chump..sure it was not a year, I just cut and paste your bull****, the point here is he fought Judah after Judah lost to Baldomir anyway... Judah was tough for PBF but not for Cotto ...that is your ridiculous pointatsch
Seriously though...Judah fought better against Floyd...because Floyd doesnt cheat and low blow after getting hit with left hand uppercut bombs like Cotto did.
Cotto fought a Judah that had been INACTIVE for a year. I stated that because its ****ing true you dip****. And no it wasn't tough for Cotto. Judah wasn't fresh and hadn't won in two years. + Cotto had to cheat to win.
Naw I dont think so... Shane is 1-1 vs. ODH in my book...and I think the consensus is that ODH looked better against Floyd then SSM did against Cotto.
Dude if you don;t know what sending a message means, then you don;t know boxing...and I am not going to waste my time explained it to you..so deal with it..he **** Judah like a cheap whoar in the morning
That you picked to win. Would you have wanted Floyd to officially "move down" to fight Hatton, instead of having Hatton fight for his title. (Hatton weighed 154, what he normally weighs as JR WW on fight night.)
In your book...dammm fool....Why you think that SSM didn;t want to fight ODLH for the third time, he proof his point by beating the Golden Boy twice....