Should Boxing announcers and journalists be required to at least box once?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Golden Boy 360, May 20, 2010.


  1. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    There won't be enough posting then.
     
  2. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    doug fischer has boxed before I believe
     
  3. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    From the way they write or speak on TV or YouTube, which of the boxing scribes would you say has laced-'em-up?
     
  4. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    8,114
    391
    Sep 2, 2009
    That girl in your avatar has NO BOOTY!
     
  5. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
  6. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    No. It's a big plus, not a requisite.
     
  7. Golden Boy 360

    Golden Boy 360 Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow Full Member

    11,452
    11
    Mar 14, 2009
    But you would still tap that, wouldn't you? Denise Milani :hey
     
  8. KnockOutArtist

    KnockOutArtist Member Full Member

    208
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    I don't see the point. Few people would call Foreman a good announcer despite his success in the ring.

    It'd might give boxing journalists and announcers a bit more flavor (I love reading what Futch, Dundee, Steward, and Holmes have to say, for example) , but yeah, I don't think it would improve their writing/commentating dramatically.

    For example, there could be a writer/announcer biased toward fighters that are the aggressor in bouts. Even if he were to get his head knocked off if he tried to box as the aggressor, he'd be just as likely to walk away with a greater appreciation for boxers that are the aggressor than to change his mind and say boxing off the back foot is more effective.
     
  9. Max Kellerman has some boxing experience. I don't think Larry Merchant does.


    Who's better?
     
  10. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Honestly only the ones who did. Jim Lampley is decent and the Shobox guys, IMHO, are better that a lot of people give them credit for, but for the most part you can tell who the "house" fighter is because these guys are "broadcast guys" not "boxing fans". I guess it goes to what you said earlier. Back then there was boxing and baseball so you couldn't help but be a "boxing guy".

    I swear most of the men in general from that time did some seriously manly stuff and thought nothing of it. The physical tests of the body were part of the right of passage into manhood. I think that gives a certain amount of humility to a guy speaking on another's talent.
     
  11. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Max is cool. He will grow into a powerhouse.
     
  12. I actually like Max. But I know most people don't.
     
  13. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009

    Your avi don't really got no...
    she just poked it out.
     
  14. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Me too. He flushed that one post fight, but on the average? I like his work. He seems very focused on boxing and not cultural "baggage" he brought with him.
     
  15. brucebufershair

    brucebufershair Active Member Full Member

    876
    1
    Apr 7, 2010
    I think they should . If i was to be employed as a boxing writer or television pundit i would get in the ring and spar a bit just to get an appreciation of what these guys do .