Should Boxing Rid Itself of the Heavyweight Division?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Nov 9, 2017.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,408
    11,440
    Jan 6, 2007
    A second Daniel !

    Was Solomon ever so wise !

    And such sublime articulation of such clearly reasoned positions on this vexing question.

    The big man's use of terms oft-neglected by lesser thinkers - crap/bollocks/shyte etc- illuminates the issue perfectly.

    When he's finished in the ring, he should follow that other leviathan of pugilism, Sugar Nickolai, into the pleasant pastures of poetry.

    He's a natural !
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,124
    Jun 2, 2006
    Valuev is quite erudite Fury,though certainly not stupid, often does his best to appear so!
     
  3. KernowWarrior

    KernowWarrior Bob Fitzsimmons much bigger brother. Full Member

    3,153
    3,482
    Jul 12, 2012
    It is the way of the world, the biggest, nastiest most fearsome creature in any pack of animals is king.

    Any fighter from any of the lower weight categories can challenge the Heavyweight champion, but as history has shown us most of the time they fail.

    But size isn't everything.......well that is what i tell my wife anyway;)
     
  4. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    I like big guys.

    No homo.
     
    Colonel Sanders likes this.