should carl froch...??

are you saying that dirrell should have won froch's belt because froch missed more?
because dirrell sure as hell wasn't busy enough to get the decision in my book

 

Im saying he should have been given the decision, because he landed more clean punches, and won the fight!

Its not "Frochs belt", its a world title fight and Dirrell was the better fighter. This whole "you have to take the belt" stuff is BS.

You score fights round by round or you dont.

Dirrell did more than enough to have his hand raised. Froch barely landed a punch on his all night. There were times in the fight where Dirrell was essentially teeing off on Froch

 

Andre Dirrelevant

 

Couldnt get up for Dirrell?

Froch was barely a name at that point. He had a title, but was still widely unknown.You're acting like he was some p4p star when he fought Dirrell!

 

Maybe if I donated my left bollock to Dirrel he might just have enough man juice to put in a worthy, title winning performance, but as it stands I rate the great Audley Harrison as having more heart than that nancy boy. Not fit to lick Froch's sweaty jock strap to be honest regardless of how you see their fight. Froch gone on to prove himself truly competitive at elite level, not world level mind you ELITE while indeed, Andre Dirrelevant is exactly that.

 

Froch beat Dirrel, end of story.

Yeah, it was close but Dirrel didn't do enough to win. It'd only butthurt 'Muricans who think otherwise.

Saying that, I wouldn't have bitched if Dirrel got the decision. It's similar to Groves vs Degale, a fight that could have gone either way.

 

KO'd by Hanshaw??????

So you;re saying Froch was such a big star that he couldnt get up for a fight?

Junior Witter,Glen Cately and Gavin Rees were world champiosn too and at that point, that was the type of champion he was.

He came up against a guy who was too slick for him, and most people had Dirrell winning

 

He may well be, but he beat Froch.

That home cooking could be smelled miles away.

 

Is Dirrell interested?, that's the real question. Because lately he has done nothing in the sport due to his serious injury. Carry on your misinformed stupidity or just create another alt, all are welcome regardless. :good

 

It was a close fight but Dirrell won it and I'm a fan of Froch. The bodyslam Froch applied would have costed him the entire fight or a point anywhere else in the world, in England though it gains you a point if you're the local fighter.

 

Saying Pacquiao beat Bradley in the first fight in factually inaccurate too.

 

I was at the Trent FM Arena along with 15 other ESB forummers.
Dirrell stank the place out that bad, that we had to put tissue up our nose's.

You do not take somebodies World title by pot shotting, then throwing yourself to the floor when the Champ tries to hit you back.

Theres a well watched youtube vid that shows how many times Dirrell clinched, and turned his back to avoid punche's.

He was way ahead against Abraham, started to run out of gas and idea's, was dropped (which the ref called a slip ) then threw himself to the floor and tried to make the cheap shot seem 50 times worse than it was.

Great talent, but absolutely fcukin spineless.

 

Quit all the winning the belt nonsense.

It doesnt matter if its for all the belts or a fight in the local town hall. A fight is scored round by round.

And i barely remember Froch landing a punch that night. I remember Dirrell landing plenty