Should Cotto's defeat be changed to a 'No Contest'

Its not the end of the world, but you always appear to be mad at the world!!!


And No it shouldn't be overturned, however, if Margie is incriminated for some reason then he should be given state issued matching pajamas!!!

 

Are you located in the hills?

You are echoing some lame ass arguments!!!

 

How do you figure?

 

Explain

 

Jerry Olaya I believe is his name...is not bad at all.....the grey haired guy
couldn't translate correctly to save his own life....

Translation...he sucks as with most of them!!!

 

Denial doesn't enter into the matter in any way, shape or form.

 

During the HBO PPV broadcast they didn't show any footage of Margarito having his hands wrapped. However, they did show Cotto having his hands being wrapped by Evangelista. During the portion they showed, Cotto sat on one side of the room while a NSAC official sat on the other. One of Miguel's sons was in the room and stood in between them (Cotto and the official) playing with a stuffed animal during the hand wrapping, partially obstructing the official's vision. Does that strike you as being strict?

 

Ouch mother****er some ***** !!! there was no need to go there man....

 

They are more strict than the CSAC, that's for sure. I can't get into full details about just how strict they are because I wasn't there during the entire handwrapping process. I understand your concerns though. You are a big Cotto fan and if there is a glimmer of hope that his only loss was due to another fighter cheating, then you are going to jump all over it. However, there is no proof that Margo cheated in that fight. None whatsoever. Me, nor anyone else, has any burden to prove that he didn't cheat. However, if people are going to accuse of him cheating, well then some sort of proof is required. What happened in the Mosley fight is not enough.

 

Nevada where prostitution and gambling is legal is more strict....yeah right

They provide the gauze and Capetillo provides the plaster!!!!

Evidence that he didn't cheat... what evidence?

Nothing improper detected by team Cotto ....naive in their thinking...they weren't looking for it and to Richardson's credit he was!!!

Nor the Commission....and the commission is right on top of things right?

 

12 Rounds .... you might want to respectfully bow out of this thread...
you are way in over your head....go join " Trouble-Man " and " Uili "

this is for knowledgable men.

 

This has nothing to do with the Athletic commission

Nothing was found. Where's the evidence that he did cheat?

Ok, but how does team Cotto not finding anything prove that Margo cheated?

Not always. But again, how does the commission not finding anything prove that Margo cheated?

It's pretty much impossible to prove that something did happen. However, if you or anyone else is going to accuse Margo of cheating, you need some evidence.

 

**** no.. Blasphemy.. The result should remain the same.. Cotto took a knee cuz he couldn't stand the pain... Booom just like that. Margarito owned him..

Margarito beats him 9/10 with or without the plaster.

 

so you're saying cotto had loaded gloves and still lost?

 

I never said Margie cheated during the Cotto fight....

I simply refer to Margie as a cheating ******* or sorry ass cheater.

We do know he cheated ( full intent to ) in the Mosley fight who was simply a tune up for him for the June rematch with Cotto.


Someone brought out an interesting point...I think maybe Varg ...that if he tried to cheat for the tune up Mosley fight....why should people believe he
wouldn't have for the fight of his life with Cotto? ( Which Margie said himself was the fight of his life )