Should Cotto's defeat be changed to a 'No Contest'

Yo man dont waste you time explaning to Finito, He would never agree that Margarito cheated, and he's never gonna back up a puertorican fighter

 

Antonio Margarito W-0 L-6 NC-37

 

Maybe...but the point can still be made.

Either way, I think it speaks well of Cotto's ablity that he was able to defeat the same guy who smoked his conqueror so completely, and even if Cotto cam from Mexico or Monaco instead of PR, you gotta give the guy props for that.

 

OMG do you actually read what you are writting. I mean whatever guy said that your arguments were lame wasn't lying. Are trying to justify the cheating. Are you a Cotto hater or a Margarito sympathizer or both.

 

I guess you dont know what sarcastic is

 

yeah you know what I wanted to say

 

Rematch, it's the only way to settle this once and for all, although i pick margo by beatdown again. that or rematch mosely either fight would sell.

 

I find it ironic that a Brit fails to grasp a Yank's obvious attempt at a bit of sarcasm.

 

rematch, IN PUERTO RICO !!!

 

Now we are talking!!!!!

 

margo aint scared to go over there .....even after being robbed

 

It should only change unless there is proof that Margo cheated in that fight. Cotto's team was there before the fight, and they didn't witness any wrong doing while taping up Margo's fists before the fight. Cotto needs to move beyond his Margo fight. The fact he is talking about this worries me about Cotto's state of mind. I hope he doesn't turn into a Cintron.

 

If you're going to give lectures on grammar, you should be sure that your own sentences are free of grammatical error.

Otherwise, you risk looking foolish.

lol,

This content is protected

guess you can

This content is protected

t string a sentence together!

This content is protected

arcasm may be the word

This content is protected

looking for in that sentence.

When making yourself the subject of a sentence, the 'I' is always capitalized, no matter how insignificant you deem yourself to be.

When using a contraction such as 'can't' you must use an apostrophe to indicate a missing letter.

When starting a new sentence, you must use a capital letter. (Sarcasm, not sarcasm)


And 'your' is a possesive. The word you were struggling unsuccessfully to find was 'you're.'



Finally, in regard to Boricua's sentence:

I guess you dont know what sarcastic is

It had two minor grammatical errors. He missed an apostrophe in DONT and he didn't put a period (what you might know as a full stop) at the end.

This makes his sentence much less error-ridden than your pseudo-pedantic response.



I guess you don't know what sarcastic is.

This is a grammatically correct sentence.




And the true irony here, as Marting has mentioned, is a Brit's failure to pick up on the sarcasm of a Yank poster.

 

+1

People don't got **** on the Cotto fight or anyone before that.. Just the Mosley fight. No hard evidence. Speculation is all they got. And don't give me that bull**** like "Look at Cotto's face! Look at that guy's ear!"