Should drug cheats be banned from HOF?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bill poster, Oct 1, 2008.


  1. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Maybe they are already- I don't know.

    Jones, Toney - should they be allowed in?
     
  2. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    They're proven cheaters, so you've got a point.:think
     
  3. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Whenever I mention drugs on ESB there is deathly silence....
     
  4. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Because their idols are cheaters.
    I personally think a proven cheater should be banned immediately.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    No every fighter pretty much try's to enhance their performance and most fighters use performance enhancing drugs today, especially at heavyweight. Most fighters of yesteryear would also. Anyone with a killer instinct will use performance enhancers with legal or illegal.
     
  6. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008
    the right is no of course, but i got a thread on the D word taken off here , so watch your back. be afraid.
     
  7. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008

    horse**** .
     
  8. this bloke

    this bloke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    Dec 6, 2007
    i think they should be allowed in
    if u do the crime ,then u do the time and then your debt is paid
     
  9. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    It'd never work because you'd have to kick out the performance enhancing drug users that are already in there. People love to look at Toney as the posterchild and might not realize that anabolic steroids were first used for athletics in the 1950's, and were involved in boxing by the 70's at the very latest, and quite likely earlier.

    Too much of a double standard to start now.
     
  10. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    in their eras I look at Hagler and Tyson as guys who probably were clean- some of their opponents I have doubts about.. but I dont think its double standards to set examples in the present era
     
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I see what you're saying here; I'm just wary of the increasing vindictiveness of sports in general when it comes to performance enhancing drugs because they have been around for so much longer than the microscope has been on the subject and, though the methods are scrutinized and judged more now than 30 years ago, most fans demand any one of bigger, stronger, faster, or better conditioned athletes and vote for that with their dollars. Alot of people enjoy the fruits of juiced up athletes only to condemn them because they don't like what they see when the curtain's pulled back on some of the training methods. What's forgotten is that these drugs aren't used by lazy fighters, but by some of the hardest working ones because they allow you to train at a higher level for longer and reduce soreness and injury time.

    Despite my playing devil's advocate, I don't like it because it's an unfair deal for truly clean fighters because PED's do work like a charm if not abused...but being completely honest, I don't necessarily blame anyone who wants to get every possible advantage possible in dog-eat-dog sports such as boxing.