Should Floyd not just fight Kell Brook

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sir axeman, Jul 2, 2015.


  1. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012

    Mayweather still holds the WBC, and WBA WW titles. If he relinquishes his JMW titles and pays a $200K sanctioning fee by tomorrow, then he will be the WBO WW champ as well.
     
  2. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,968
    17,053
    Jul 25, 2014
    yeah so beating brook wouldn't mean that he unified all the titles.
     
  3. Rampage88

    Rampage88 Active Member Full Member

    694
    3
    Mar 25, 2014
    It would, he hasn't vacated the any of the belts yet. If he vacated his light middle belts the WBO would allow him to keep his WBO WW title and he could fight Brook with all 4 WW titles on the line.
     
  4. LeadLeftHook

    LeadLeftHook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,853
    1
    Apr 4, 2007
    Floyd Mayweather does not need an unknown fighter like Brook with padded resume of 34 wins against 33 tomato cans to be "undisputed".
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,968
    17,053
    Jul 25, 2014
    i thought bradley fought for the wbo titel, I guess i got my info wrong, etiher way Brook fighting Gavin and dan is not a good way to promote a ppv fight, if Brook beats Thurman he definitely deserves it though.
     
  6. BodyBlaster

    BodyBlaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    65
    Jul 25, 2007
    How do you market a fight between the p4p number 1 and special needs, half a chromosome away from downs syndrome?

    He should fight Khunt, who is even easier fight but more marketable.