should floyd not take the fight with pacquiao if he won't get more than 50% split?

floyd still won't give 50/50 and is taking all the PPV upside.

 

apparently, floyd did not take pac's challenge and decided to fight pac's victim miguel cotto.

 

:deal

 

you mean in 2010? or do you think floyd should have fought pac instead of jmm then in 2009?

 

but it was floyd who was fighting cotto after floyd priced himself out.

 

bump for posters like PrinceN and Badbot who thinks floyd should not take the figth if he won't get more than 50/50.

 

bump for sdsfinest. another ***** who joined the bandwagon that floyd should get more than 50/50 before fighting pacquiao.

 

true. only hardcore *****s like sdsfinest would enjoy floyd earning huge money without fighting pac.

floyd has to fight pac now until he is relevant. the guy is declining fast and would be retiring soon.

 

apparently, floyd's main concern aside from money is his health when he would fight pacquiao.

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/171777-mayweather-costas-talk-pacquiao-cotto-floyd-sr-?start=1

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

floyd still insisting on a fix guarantee. this would stll be a roadblock on next nego after their respective fights.