should floyd not take the fight with pacquiao if he won't get more than 50% split?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by puga_ni_nana, Jan 22, 2012.


  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    And Kid Presentable, with Pac saying 50-50 ANYPLACE, ANYTIME, we can conclude that meant MGM on 05/05/12 was fine with him. Not a roadblock by any means.
     
  2. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008

    Why is OSDT a roadblock. its a ****ing sample of blood taken once before the fight? why did they say in 2009 it wasn't a problem and then backtrack and pull out of talks?

    i know your a massive Pac fan fair enough but don't try to insult my intelligence so you can feel better about your idol when you sleep at night.

    Some of my best friends are huge Pac fans and have said they can't belive the **** that has gone on for the last three years.
     
  3. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yes, the idiocy you are showing. :patsch

    Look, Sure pac didn't want to do the blood test the FIST TIME, but he conceded after. Got that ? AFTER. So you ask WHY he was fine later after saying NO the first time? It's called trying to get the fight made.

    When you try to act smart, you're really coming of as more like a ****in ******.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch live in the past Rain man. That's all you can do at this point. What, you want Pac to go back in time and change what he said? :lol:

    ****in get over it dip****. Floyd is the one who's stopped this by declining 50-50, and you even know this. ****....now you sound like a fanboy cheerleaders I put on ignore.
     
  5. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008

    i said i think 50/50 is fair


    my point is that Pac's admitted bullshitting about agreeing to take a smaller purse when in fact he won't.

    Why the **** did he say that he would if he wouldn't? BULL****

    In 2009 he said drugtests weren't a problem then he pulls out of talks stating drug tests as the issue. BULL****

    see a pattern here.
     
  6. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008

    You really are a ****ing moron. Calling me a fanboy or Rainman as hilarious as it is doesn't justify team Pac's bull****.

    Floyd called Manny's bluff again like he did in 2009.

    i don't want to get over it. i actually want this fight to happen.
     
  7. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008

    lol how did he concede? by pulling out of the fight? LOL why you getting mad at my comments to other posters? ALT much? ****ing loser do me a favour and put me on your ignore list you ****ing ******.
     
  8. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008


    We supposed to take Pac's word for that. like testing wasn't an issue when he was? or when he would take the smaller purse and he wouldn't.

    BULL****. thats all Team pac have been serving up for last three years.

    Absolute bull****.
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    :lol: I told that ****** Lance to put me on his ignore list too a few days ago and he finally did it today after I made him look stupid

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=376102&page=5
     
  10. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008

    He says it like i should be terrified he'll put me on his ignore list!

    lol what a complete moron.

    Fair play to him he loves Pac. i get it for ****s sake.
     
  11. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    yeah you're a simpleton that's the reason why you have no clue of what is a NEGOTIATION means :good
     
  12. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    This was decided YEARS ago. On top of that you added in some BS speculation to boot. :roll:

    Pac fans. :bart
     
  13. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    I will take less than 50% seems pretty clear. :think
     
  14. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    let me ask you a question, does pac officially offer that he will take less than 50% or not? :smoke
     
  15. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    I know everyone should be proud of their accomplishments, but c'mon man this ish happens all day erry day. :lol: