Should GGG just move up now?

And Zoo quit against Hatton a guy PBF made dance with the ring post and stopped.:deal I know he beats Zoo and so far I've been proven right 49-0 there's no blueprint, there's 2 blueprints out on Zoo.:hi:

 

At this point, I think he should stay at MW, break the record and unify, then see what is there at 168.

Though some may disagree, breaking the record would have historical significance in the division and punches his ticket to the HOF

 

And Floyd fights like neither.

Anyway back to the topic in hand tell me Hopkins 5 best victories against middleweight opposition not including Tito or DLH, because you've mentioned Jones and Taylor yet Hopkins lost to them.

Let's here it.

 

I will mention them because he beat them there why don't you want me to mention them? Because they destroy your argument that's why. Hey man just throw out two of his best wins because they won't let me win this argument, you're too much.:rofl

 

Okay add them.

Tito is a legit win but DLH is not. Anyone with an ounce of sense knows this. It's like rating Joppy win over Duran because of what Duran did at 135, 147 and 154.

You're avoiding the question by trying yo be a clever **** yet making yourself look dumb because deep down you know Hopkins reign was weak.

 

Right I'm off to bed hope to see Pimpernel C's top 5 in the morning.

 

Right I'm up ready for work and still no top 5.

Pimp C, where are you?

 

hey OD, I don't get when you list Hopkins opponents you miss out some of the best ones like ODLH (multiweight wonder), Trinidad and Echols (the guy who put the shyts up joe cal)..

it does makes Hopkins oppoents look less good when you omit some of the best.


on the plus side I do rthink 3G should stay at MW, its too late for him to move up unless he fights deliberately weakened 40somethings who he can guaranteee to outgass and thus beat.

 

DLH whilst a great fighter wasn't a great middleweight, got a gift against Sturm and should really be 0-2 at 160, I've already stated this.

Trinidad was a good win as he was legit at 160. Again I'm not disputing this. I'm disputing the calibre of fighters beneath Hopkins and Tito.

Echols, he's a live dog in any fight but he had only fought 2 fighters of note in Barbosa and Lucas and are these great names i think not.

 

this isn't an answer - u leave them out of your lists when u are comparing the two lists.

why? what you've written is NOT a reason to leave them out.

 

Do you consider De La Hoya an elite middleweight?

As for Tito I've said it is a good win but DLH isn't, he's a great fighter but not a great middleweight. What part of that is hard to understand?

 

right so that's not an answer yet again.


consider - when making your lists of resumes to compare, why do you not leave out 3G's entire resume, since there are no elites on it?


u are not making sense - explain why you include only partial resume for hop, leaving out some of his best opposition.

explain it properly this time no duk n dive yet again, ty mate.

 

Well I have and once again you are trying to be a clever ****.

Fire up Hopkins top 5 wins, include DLH if you like because his name doesn't hold no weight at 160.

It's not hard to process, but then again...

 

why is telling you 3g has no elites in repsonise to you saying ODLH is not elite, a clever response - its a clear debunk of what you said.

aha interesting so you were listing top five wins previously? ok -


Joppy
Echols x2
Holmes
Trinidad