Should Haye be above Wlad Klistchko pound for pound?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Sep 3, 2008.


  1. Loggo

    Loggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,029
    2
    Mar 26, 2006
    He`d knock the crap out of Cunningham.The fight wouldn`t sell in Britain that well anyway.Cunningham never beat a big name fighter.
     
  2. El Borracho

    El Borracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,053
    0
    Jun 22, 2008
    Well, Haye is #1 P4P ATG; so, of course.
     
  3. Scotty78

    Scotty78 Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Dec 19, 2007
    P4P Haye has achieved more then Wlad has. Is'nt that what the P4P list is about ? , Wlad is'nt the undisputed h/w champ.
     
  4. GrimReaper

    GrimReaper Randi's Bulldog Full Member

    478
    1
    May 5, 2008
    Haye wasnt the undisputed cruiserweight champ either, Cunningham has a belt
     
  5. shadow boxer

    shadow boxer Member Full Member

    322
    0
    Aug 26, 2008
    Love Haye and am very ecited bout his foray into the heavyweight division but there is no way you can rate him above Klitschko. Haye did effectively clean up his division with the possible exception of Cunningham but this is a less renowned division than the heavyweight. Wlad has beaten everyone put in front of him and is on his way to unifying the belts. He has suffered some setback defeats but so did the last undisputed champ Lennox Lewis and he came back from them. Haye has the potential to be great but at the moment he must rate behind Klitschko.
     
  6. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Yes, IMO, until Haye officially fights at HW. For now, Haye is 50 pounds lighter than Wlad, which is enough to put him higher on the P4P list. Once he's only 20 pounds lighter, then he's probably not.
     
  7. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007

    What are you talking about? Look at Haye's resume, then Wlad's...if you still think that it true you are definitely ******ed or British.
     
  8. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    umm where do you people base your p4p rankings? resume? skill?
     
  9. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,963
    514
    Oct 15, 2007
    I think P4p Haye is higher!
     
  10. Scotty78

    Scotty78 Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Dec 19, 2007
    I did , and stand by my ' british ' opinion , Wlads 3 KO loss es , in a shite h/w divison.:yep
     
  11. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Nope he isn´t, maybe universally recognized but not undiputed. I´m not a boxer and not even a cw but I dispute him :lol:
     
  12. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007
    even if its a string of probably the worst top 10 heavies ever ?
    ( not having a dig , its an honest question)

    if I understand P4P the theory is if they were the same size who would win , by that rational I think Haye has to edge it.
     
  13. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    Great, he's a shite fighter, he'll fit right in when he gets knocked the **** out in his first real fight.
     
  14. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    I agree

    but as far as the mouth goes Haye is pound for pound quality
     
  15. Sputnik44

    Sputnik44 Active Member Full Member

    1,278
    5
    Jul 18, 2006

    See the only reason I would give Haye a chance is because of his speed and decent pop. If they were the same size I don't see him carrying that speed and Wlad's a better boxer by far... so I would say P4P Wlad is above Haye

    If we think about it in another context haye might have an argument against Wlad in the P4P rankings as a cruiserweight, but now he's a heavy and hasn't done anything at his current weight so I wouldn't even put him on a P4P ranking