Should Haye fight another bum or take a risk before Klit?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by KobeIsGod, Dec 1, 2008.


  1. stuey

    stuey Never bet on England Full Member

    3,568
    0
    Aug 13, 2004
    possibly,but i watched it live and peter barely threw a punch, seriously,he let **** all go all fight, target practice for vit.
     
  2. madpup

    madpup Active Member Full Member

    1,061
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Peter may be enormously strong but his lack of punching technique and speed results in being very difficult for him to actually deliver those punches against good opponents. It is like the equivalent of having a 12 inch **** and being a premature ejaculator.
     
  3. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    I don't get the hype over Chambers. He has good handspeed but apart from that everything else is average/poor. He hasn't got much power, poor footwork, poor defence and only fights in bursts. He stays against the ropes and goes into a shell almost (kinda like Abraham but doing it in shitter manner). That would be a good fight for Haye to take and I say he KO's him before 5.

    Povetkin would give Haye some problems. Haye would need to keep Povetkin at a distance to have success against him cos if Povetkin gets on the inside Haye's pretty much ****ed it-too much pressure and too many accurate punches for Haye to deal with. However, I'm not sold on Povetkin's chin. He may have took some shots form Chambers but he's not a puncher. Could he take Haye's best punches and still keep throwing back? If he can then he stops Haye between rounds 5-9 IMO but if he can't then it's the Hayemaker by KO.