Sometimes on Lederman's round by round scoring I literally look around at the people with me, and ask out loud, "what ****in' fight is he watching?"
There's no agenda, ****. Taking the minority position in this debate is for the purposes of stimulating conversation. Don't tell me ****. I'm not interested in changing minds or leading the discussion. Balance is the objective. You've exposed your lack of intelligence and understanding, again. I've looked at your posts, idiot. You're a stupid mother****er. No bull****. I'll take advice from those who are worthy of sharing advice, not morons like you, suckscoxx.
^ Well put, that's what we're talking about here. Literally, Lederman comes up with results that are so surreal, so bizarre, I have literally out loud said that exact thing to myself on many occasion.
Horrific! In the first Juan Manuel Marquez-Manny Pacquiao fight, Lederman scored it 7 rounds to 5 for Manny Pacquiao!atsch :-( If you take Pacquiao's 3 knockdowns away in that first round, Lederman still has Pacquiao winning! :nut Horrific!
I tell you what I trust his old school style of scoring a lot more than I do these new age ****s who want to turn boxing into fencing instead of a fight which is what it should be. I usualy agree with Harolds scoring 98% of the time notable differences Hatton vs PBF Calzaghe Hopkins Quartey vs DLH I never forget he had John John Molina winning his fight against DLH which I also thought he won its never mentioned. He also had DLH vs Trinidad a draw for all those who say it was a boxing clinic. I trust his opinion a lot more than I do actual judges at ringside or many morons on this forum who dont know how to score a fight.
that my friend is a good thing why should some safety first guy get any bennies its the guy daring to be great bringing it and trying to make it a fight that should be rewarded.
Yup, that pretty much sums me up. Ledderman is an idiot, no doubt, but he's one of those guys you love to hate. I do him give him credit for knowing the sport. He's a hellva a boxing historian. He knows his ****, just can't score a fight to save his life.
I gotta tell you, Rafael, i don't always agree with Harold. But he gets it right more often than the judges. We agree on about 80 - 90% of the rounds we jointly score. Keep Harold.
Considering that his scoring does not affect the fight in any way I dont see the need to replace him. He brings entertainment to the table so I dont think he hurts the broadcast. Also, I dont think it matters who they put in there because there will always be times where someone doesn't agree with the scoring. And furthermore, replace him with who?