Should Heavyweights be on Pound 4 Pound lists?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ripcity, May 10, 2008.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    That's not a very good list.
     
  2. NBT

    NBT Mοderator of Death Full Member

    2,605
    5
    Mar 9, 2006
    There is nothing objective about p4p list because p4p lists don't make any sense at all, you just can't compare different weight classes. p4p lists are popularity contests that's all.
    I think I have to visualize it...
    This content is protected

    It just doesn't make any sense that the midget in the middle should be listed above the guy on the left on any list which has anything to do with boxing. It's just ridiculous.
     
  3. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    for that statement alone you have proved your stupidity my dim witted scottish friend,how about you take your head out of your arse and look into reality.
     
  4. LightningJoe

    LightningJoe The Filipino Flash Full Member

    1,362
    1
    Dec 30, 2007
    If they are good enough of course they should be there.
     
  5. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    Pound for Pound is just too damn subjective to be anything more than a barroom discussion. So when people ask who's the greatest boxer ever I always say Muhammad Ali as I don't think I would bet against him against any other fighter ever head to head. I know it's not a fair fight for a 200 lb. Ali to fight a 147 lb. Robinson, but that's just the way it is with me. Plus there are many examples of smaller men going way up in weight and having some success, Lous-Conn, Jones-Ruiz, etc.
     
  6. Hugh Jerrod

    Hugh Jerrod Chief boot knocker Full Member

    334
    1
    May 3, 2008
    The smaller ones, like Tyson.