should kovalev be considered lineal due to activity?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by itsa, Jul 26, 2015.


  1. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,568
    16,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    If you're asking this silly question, I'm not sure you really understand the concept behind the lineage of lineal championships.

    :smoke
     
  3. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011

    :huhI've heard some doosies but that one is master class.:lol:
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,418
    Nov 30, 2006
    That isn't how lineal works...
     
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,202
    27,913
    Jan 18, 2010
    Haha!
    This is gold, but I guess you actually mean consensus champ instead of lineal.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,418
    Nov 30, 2006
    :nod

    For which there's a case...

    "Lineal", though, not so much.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,135
    Mar 21, 2007
    Consider him the best. That's what he almost certainly is.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,418
    Nov 30, 2006
    :good

    All that is left is to unify with Adonis Stevenson, but that is technically all the separates Wlad from being the best at heavy and nobody thinks he really needs to unify with Deontay Wilder to prove that.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,418
    Nov 30, 2006
    Come to mention it, actually, isn't Wilder technically lineal champ?
     
  10. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    No, I would imagine it would've been vacant since Lewis retired. No 1 v No 2 won't have happened due to the Klitschko brothers ruling until Vlad beat Povetkin.

    The 175 is more debatable I think going all the way back to the Jones/ Dariuz debate.
     
  11. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,361
    7,940
    Sep 2, 2011
    You don't need to open that can of worms IB.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,418
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yeah, what am I thinking - he beat Stiverne, who beat Arreola for the vacant WBC title. He certainly didn't beat "the man" (as Stiverne was never "the man", and never even faced anyone that was "the man" to become champ).

    I remember having read someone recently calling Wilder the lineal champ but must've been a troll or someone very badly confused, or they meant "WBC champ" (which is viewed as the most legitimate of the 4 major alphabet org belts, as that was the one Ali wore, and the one Tyson wore throughout his prime from Berbick through Douglas)
     
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    Stevenson is lineal champion.

    Many/most people have been ranking Kovalev #1, however, since the Hopkins fight. And with good reason. I do too and it seems pretty clear.

    Even more clear, however, is that Kovalev is not lineal.
     
  14. Xelloss

    Xelloss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,854
    8
    Oct 23, 2013
    I think lineal is outdated and overrated at the moment, because due to politics it is even less of an indicator of the "best" than it once was. There are no mandatories to the "lineal" champ and no way to get a shot at one other than being expected to lose, or a far more popular fighter able to bring insane money to the table.
     
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    General silliness and trolling appears to be the sole purpose of this site nowadays.