Should Mayweather-Pacquiao be changed to a No Contest?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015.


  1. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    And for the record, I didn't like what Floyd did. That's a clear manipulation of the rules. **** happens. The NSAC didn't approve of this method of dehydration so close to the fight...but if it was allowed by the NSAC in the past, and USADA cleared him of any failed tests, you can't overturn a fight. Floyd's punishment is that the fans spoke and that he had to explain himself to the fans.
     
  2. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    If Manny, under breach of contract, was loading up 750ml of saline/vitamins via IV, which is a known method for masking PEDs and thus illegal under WADA, you would be "good" with that? I find that really difficult to believe.
     
  3. Bollywooden

    Bollywooden Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,233
    642
    Jun 8, 2014
    Forget Blizz man, you may as well be talking to that big braindead idiot that Floyd pays to make a bell of himself yelling "TMT" repeatedly except Blizz is dumb enough to spew his b/s for free.

    It should be changed to NC but either way, an asterisk has now been put beside the fight and his career. Truth will always conquer.
     
  4. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    I've seen both fighters accused of anything and everything under the sun by you fan boys. I could care less what any of you fan boys ever think when it comes to how "you" think that I think.:lol: No offense.

    In boxing you're either innocent or guilty. I'm guilty of calling Pac suspect. I've never called him guilty of PED use. You won't find one post of mine on this forum accusing Pac of being guilty of PED use. Not one.
     
  5. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    Please source this. I feel like you are continually mixing up USADA and NSAC in your posts. Bennett from NSAC, in the LA Times piece today, did not suggest this at all. In fact he said it should never have happened and the USADA was wrong in how they handled it.

    Quoted from this LA Times story: http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-ps-sn-usada-floyd-mayweather-iv-20150910-story.html

    This content is protected
     
  6. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Who cares where you place "your" asterik. Hide it in your ass for all I care cry baby. The fight still stands. You feel my posts. They ****en sting don't they lmao.:lol:
     
  7. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    How noble!

    By the way, the phrase is "couldn't care less" not "could care less." Think about that for a moment and you may understand why. Knowing is half the battle!

    PS-Don't call me a god damned fan boy. I'm not even a fan of Pac or Mayweather.
     
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    'Tis why I've always answered in the affirmative anytime questioned if I felt a particular world class athlete was on PED's or not. Because the vast, vast majority are. My a$$ has been consistent and vocal on the issue. Look no further than my post the night before the accusatory report of discussion was released.
     
  9. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Dayum, fancy colors and big text, woahhhh!

    See, this is why I said I am going to hold off on even having an opinion here. Wait for everything to come out, wait for everything to be figured out in court (what's true, what's not, what's legal, what's contractual, what was really said, etc). Too much contradictory reporting and statements going on.
     
  10. Bollywooden

    Bollywooden Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,233
    642
    Jun 8, 2014
    I skim your posts man, don't even read 'em, and it's not my asterisk, the cat is out of the bag, mass media are all over it, it's a wrap.
     
  11. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    I think you may just have reading comprehension problems. It's funny that you're in threads telling people how they are "mixed up" about this and that though, while being completely wrong. I'm just quoting the actual people from NSAC. I'm not sure where you're getting your info.

    That said, we'll see what the inevitable investigation finds.
     
  12. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    You read them though.

    You're a "now" fan. You're nothing more than a blind fan boy. Stay stuck in that category of "no respect" lol. Keep up the bad work!:lol: I'm moving oooooooooon!!!:lol:
     
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Getting my info from the same place everybody is getting theirs: the internet.

    Agree with last sentence.
     
  14. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    Source to where you read NSAC knew about the IV and gave permission ahead of time?
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    I guess I can try to track it down for you.