Should Naseem Hamed be in the Hall of Fame?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jetset78, Oct 25, 2007.


  1. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    Yeah kevin kelley, wilfredo vazquez, tom johnson and bungi are all bums right, lol. Morons.
     
  2. Smazz20

    Smazz20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,856
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    yes. hof is not just reserved for atg. hamed easily deserves his spot in the hof.
     
  3. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    He deserves to be in. By the way even this Naz nutlicker insinuates PAC will be the toughest on Hamed
     
  4. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
  5. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    so what! Hes got great ring entrances...this is sports entertainment isnt it? He was an exciting fighter as well with 1 defeat.
     
  6. Smazz20

    Smazz20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,856
    1
    Dec 19, 2006

    When you are on here asking why Barrera should be given entrance to the HOF and people ask you who he's beat, your gonna mention Hamed so what's the point in trying to run him down:think
     
  7. rreed23

    rreed23 aka Gordon Gekko Full Member

    1,874
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    ??? He was one one the best Featherweights All Time
     
  8. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Greatâ„¢ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    hall of shame lol j/k
    it's just a shame that after his loss to Barrera he already quit boxing.
    though he made quick 1 comeback fight against Manuel Calvo lol


    he's an hof but not atg.
     
  9. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    Yes

    the HOF isn't that special in boxing.. look who's already in, and he belongs in that group.
     
  10. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Nopes . . . he is famous alright, but quiting after just one loss leaves a bad taste in his personality as fighter as a whole.
     
  11. gruuby

    gruuby CONFIRMED FOR BRAWL Full Member

    785
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Yes, he was a very good, memorable fighter.
     
  12. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    No. Not at all in my opinion.
     
  13. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    yes cos he brought alot of new fans to boxing!
     
  14. hitman_hatton1

    hitman_hatton1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,733
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    i can understand why the opinions are so up and down on it.

    hamed did fight a lot of guys that had seen better days.

    like johnson, bungu, kelley, medina.

    but on the flipside he still did a job on those guys at the time they were at the top of the division.

    that's all u can do really.
    but then there's the barrera fight where he flopped badly. :patsch and he walked away after that. :-(

    i say yes.

    if u let in norton and bazza then naz has to go in. :deal
     
  15. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Yes.

    Look at some of the fighters in there...some have not even been world champions...mere contenders

    on that basis alone **** yes he should be in !