Should Pacquiao now be ahead of Mayweather Pound for Pound ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pasky2000, Mar 16, 2008.


  1. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,186
    Jun 23, 2005
    :-( :patsch
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,186
    Jun 23, 2005
    Dumbest post of the year.
     
  3. ipe

    ipe Member Full Member

    378
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    No, still #2
     
  4. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Co-sign
     
  5. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    I still believe Mayweather is # 1 pound for pound from his accomplishments ! But sooner or later, He will have to do more to secure that spot if he desires to stay there....

    Another De La Hoya fight does nothing for him at this stage and if Pacquiao can win the WBC belt at 135 and somehow upset Hatton at 140....Mayweather will have to face Cotto and beat him convincingly in order to gain back his # 1 spot at that point !!

    What made Ali so special as an ATG, its the guts he showed to consistently fight guys like Frazier, Liston and Foreman, etc....throughout his entire career, not just a few years ?

    Once again, on talent alone...Mayweather will stay there at # 1 until a new generation whiz kid comes along......but this pound for pound ranking is about accomplishments in the ring and the type of opposition faced to achieve these accomplishments !!!
     
  6. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    i've said it time and time again. anybody who thinks pac should be ahead of pbf after that performance should be shot

    the pacfanatics said that if pac demolishes jmm, then he should earn than top spot, which was debatable. but now that there clearly was no demolishing that took place. saying that pac should be #1 is just downright stupid
     
  7. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
  8. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Exactly.

    I felt JMM edged Pac which means that manny has dropped a couple of spots in my p4p list
     
  9. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    i disagree wtih you latter statement, i fell he has done enough to keep his spot, two or three in p4p rankings. i dont understand why a fighter should drop a couple of spots by winning. unless there was someone who was below him in the standings who won a bigger fight.
     
  10. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    No. Pac stays at #2.
     
  11. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006

    :good
     
  12. belmondodesigns

    belmondodesigns New Member Full Member

    66
    0
    Dec 25, 2006
    Still Mayweather even he is boring to watch.....Marquez is so lucky not to get hit with 2 to 3 combos of Manny only one lucky punch that nailed him (3rd Round)....I thought its over.....
     
  13. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Dude the thing about Floyd is the say thing that you get with who ever is the guy on top in boxing.

    Who ever he fights is a bum, and whoever he doesnt fight is the one that could have beat him. Im have seen this pattern repeated in boxing for 25 years. Before every fight People are saying..Oh now Floyds going to get now he is fighting a guy that can beat him...Then after the fight..Its oh that guy was a bum or he was too small and old. Well those very things could be and have been said about Pac's opponents. The difference between the two is Floyd Actually wins his fights.
     
  14. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,674
    14,140
    Mar 5, 2006
    Kessler is no Marquez and neither is Jeff Lacy.

    Pac still #2.

    they have bedroom suites at the thomas and mack for cal's next yawnathon fight.