Should Refs Score Fights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KidPerat, Jul 23, 2012.


  1. KidPerat

    KidPerat King Bee Full Member

    789
    1
    Oct 15, 2011
    In the early 20th century in some states the ref would score the fight along with two judges. In England the ref was sometimes the only scorer. With all the controversial decisions lately do you think it would be better to get rid of the third judge and let the ref submit his score as well?
     
  2. larryx2012

    larryx2012 I AM BETTER THEN YOU Full Member

    12,523
    33
    May 24, 2012
    Well he does see mostly everything.i say yes
     
  3. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    No the refree should enforce the rules and protect the boxers.
     
  4. KidPerat

    KidPerat King Bee Full Member

    789
    1
    Oct 15, 2011
    I agree but the counter argument is that the ref has too much to do already. I like the idea though because it offers a different perspective.
     
  5. KidPerat

    KidPerat King Bee Full Member

    789
    1
    Oct 15, 2011
    Maybe they can help protect them from the judges ;)
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I think they can do an adequate job of refereeing and scoring at the same time, so why not? They have the best position of anyone so their opinion should carry plenty of weight.
     
  7. caballo

    caballo Active Member Full Member

    740
    3
    Sep 4, 2004
    Most of you guys (and gals) are probably too young to remember this fight. But back in the day, Floyd Patterson in one of his last fights fought Jimmy Ellis for the heavyweight championship. Jimmy Ellis at the time was best known as an Ali sparring partner. If Patterson won, he would have won the heavyweight championship for the 3rd time. The fight was on TV and I believe somewhere in Scandinavia. I can't remember exactly where. The ref was the ONLY SCORER in the fight. Patterson got knocked down at least once early on in the fight, maybe twice. But he came back and at least in my young mind, there was no question he had won the fight. When the fight ended, the ref immediately walked over to Ellis and lifted his hand in victory.

    I was crushed. It was the first real rip-off decision I had experienced in my life. But I've never forgotten it. It has always surprised me a bigger deal wasn't made of this fight, because it would have put Patterson even more in the history books.

    Yes, the ref is on top of the action. But let him keep his one job. To protect the fighters.
     
  8. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,505
    5,760
    Aug 19, 2010
    Why ? A judge and a referee do two completelly different things.....is much better keep things separated....
     
  9. KidPerat

    KidPerat King Bee Full Member

    789
    1
    Oct 15, 2011
    The ref as the sole scorer is a terrible idea but it was the norm in Europe in the 19th and early 20th centuries. A lot of the epic fights in Madison Square Garden during the 20's, 30's, 40's and 50's involved the ref and two judges. I'd like to see some state athletic commissions go old school and give it a try.
     
  10. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    just imagine if Eddie Cotton (who was doing everything to make it a close fight) was scoring and refereeing Lewis-Tyson

    the ref is there to protect the fighters, the ringside judges (however bad they are) are there to score the fight
     
  11. KidPerat

    KidPerat King Bee Full Member

    789
    1
    Oct 15, 2011
    It's a good argument I just disagree. I'd at least like to see the state commissions let refs submit unofficial scores for the public to see. It would of course add some "unnecessary" controversy but it would be interesting.
     
  12. Natural1

    Natural1 Guest

    This. No way a ref should have the responsibility of scoring as well as enforcing the rules, and protecting the fighters.
     
  13. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    I see refs in UK scoring the undercard non title bouts and hate it. The ref has enough to do in the ring, and judging shouldn't be left to one person.

    If anything, I'd like to see somehow the press row scoring be counted as an official score in addition to the ringside judges.
     
  14. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    I imagine 3 people at ring side dedicated to scoring the fight is better than one guy in the ring whose 1st responsiblity is to protect the fighters and ref the right.
     
  15. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    nope, it'll put less focus on their actual job of reffereeing and there'll be even more incompetent reffing than we're currently experiencing.

    not top mention a ref is no more difficult to buy off and corrupt than a judge is, so wouldn't change a damn thign as far as fairness, there'd just be one more crooked job to investigate.