Should Shane Mosley Retire?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mikeweavertime, May 2, 2010.


  1. AceNguyen

    AceNguyen Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,098
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    Fight Berto in a final fight. Great test of youth vs. experience and a winnable fight.
     
  2. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    It's up to him. His legacy is pretty much set in stone.

    I'm not sure he can beat anyone that would really enhance his legacy (Unless he beats Berto and Berto moves on to be an ATG/HOF caliber fighter). He could also do intriguing, crowd pleasing fights against other past-their-best household name fighters and cash out (Judah, Cotto, even Hatton or DLH III [Oscar's still got that itch, especially if the $$ is right]).
     
  3. SteveO

    SteveO MSW Full Member

    4,255
    14
    Feb 4, 2007
    I think he could do well in 1 or 2 more fights.

    Do a "for the fans" sort of thing where he fights in front of his hometown and looks like his old self while outclassing a guy who was a player years ago, like Jones did against Sheika and Lacy.
     
  4. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    I agree with those who say it's up to him.

    If he retires now, it's all good. Nothing else to prove really.

    But imo he still has a few good options like some of you already mentioned. He can still beat a lot of fighters out there, it's not like he's totally shot or anything, he lost to one of the best (if not the best) out there. He could at least fight Berto or Clottey and try to retire with a bang.
     
  5. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Watch an interview with Mosley from years ago, no speech slurring.
    Watching 24/7 you can hear it's already started and last night wouldn't have helped.

    Retire, I don't need another Holyfield/Jones Jr walking around.
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,027
    Jul 19, 2004
    I say retire.

    Shane's always prided himself in wanting to prove himself against the best, and the best just thoroughly outclassed him.

    I don't want to see Shane hanging around fighting meaningless fights.

    I understand there are still fights he can probably win, and I am not one who ONCE said that he 'got old overnight' or anything of the sort.

    But he's 38 years old right now, and he will never be better than Floyd.

    Shane's time has passed, and in the end, you're right--his legacy is "secured", but at the end of the day, this man will never get high praise or credit and perhaps he didn't deserve it.

    I will always admire his attitude, though.

    When guys like Forrest and Winky were stuck on the outside looking in, Shane gave them opportunities then demanded immediate rematches. That was the kind of guy he made.

    He didn't do the business blue print of a Roy Jones, he was a throwback fighter in that regard. He did, however, make some poor career decisions and those will always haunt his legacy.

    At the end of the day, I think Shane's "dare to be great" attitude may have limited how he will be regarded by future historians.
     
  7. rinnyc

    rinnyc Member Full Member

    438
    0
    Sep 20, 2009

    + 1 Well stated.
     
  8. Ecks

    Ecks Member Full Member

    472
    15
    Nov 13, 2009
    Maybe a farewell fight if he can get a good name. I think even Berto would have UD'd Mosley last night. He's not going to beat the top guys at 154 or 160 much less 147, Pac Ko's him, not that he's gonna get a shot now...
     
  9. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    He can do what he wants, but he looks like he's done. He doesn't have the speed and agility anymore.
     
  10. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    stick a fork in him 'cause he's done.
     
  11. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    he made some good coin last night, and has nothing left to prove, IMO, so no reason to keep going, unless he wants an easy fight to go out with a win
     
  12. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Anglo? :blood

    Seriously, I think you have a point there in the sense that he got beat almost everytime he faced an elite fighter (Forrest, Winky, Mayweather). Still, he was once considered the p4p#1 and a monster, and he did beat another great in Oscar De La Hoya at least once.

    I believe Mosley has been one of the most consistent fighters I've seen around and at least at some points of his career he was definitely elite.

    I'd like to hear about the poor career decisions he made, and what he could or should have done differently according to your take.
     
  13. remi

    remi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    0
    Jul 7, 2008
    this is the problem with boxing nowadays. Anytime a boxer loses the 1st questions that is thrown in the air is whether or not he should retire. What's up with that? Have you notice all of mayweather's opponents for some reason stop throwing punches after being hit. For a guy who people say has no punching power, he often alters the way his opponents fight. Mosley was supposed to be stronger, just as fast, and bigger. He was all of that for the 1st 2 rounds. But then something happened. The intelligence of floyd mayweather kicked in and so did the adjustments with it. Boxing is not only about blood and war, boxing too has a scientific method to it as well. Mayweather will never get his full props, which is ok b/c that's how it is, but he simply outclassed a bigger man who had tremendous speed and power. keep hating haters.
     
  14. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,027
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, for starters, when he was offered a chance for a third fight with DLH for a career high $10 million (a sum I believe he still never made for a single fight), that was probably his worst mistake.

    Regardless of who you thought won Shane's rematch with DLH, Shane was clearly coming on strong in the second half and you could see him finally regaining some of his lost confidence from the Forrest fight during the course of their rematch.

    A third fight with DLH was necessary. Why?

    A. I think Shane beats him decisively a third time.
    B. He would have been in the driver's seat and probably would have gotten a showdown in what I personally view as a favorable match-up against Trinidad.

    Instead of fighting the third fight with DLH, he took on a stylistic nightmare in the form of Winky Wright.

    Does this example suffice?
     
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,540
    16,027
    Jul 19, 2004
    In Shane's situation, this is a perfectly valid question.

    I think I summed it up nicely when I said:

    Shane's always prided himself in wanting to prove himself against the best, and the best just thoroughly outclassed him.

    I don't want to see Shane hanging around fighting meaningless fights.