Should there be a mandatory retirement age in boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Aug 22, 2015.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    In the last couple of weeks we've seen James Toney, Glen Johnson, Antonio Tarver and Roy Jones fight. Next week Shane Mosley and Ricardo Mayogrga are fighting. Razor Ruddock has returned to the ring. Bernard Hopkins is planning on fighting again. Rocky Balboa will return in Creed. Oscar De La Hoya made some noise about a comeback.

    Should there be a set age limit when it's not legal in boxing or should it be on a case by case basis?
     
  2. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    I believe there should. Bernard Hopkins has been the exception to the rule but it's often not a good idea. The last thing to go may well be the punch, but the first thing is the ability to get out of the way of one.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,631
    81,652
    Nov 30, 2006
    Case by case basis, obviously.

    For instance, the fact that Dewey Bozella made his professional debut at 52 gladdens me.

    The fact that Michael Katsidis at 35 is still going, however, or that he even fought past 32, saddens me.
     
  4. LordSouness

    LordSouness Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,195
    691
    Feb 15, 2014
    Probably should be more stringent health checks beyond a certain point to determine whether someone should essentially be forced into retirement.

    Furthermore, I think the creation of a good pension plan for professional boxing - similar to the one they have in tennis - would probably help things in that department.
     
  5. qwertyblahblah

    qwertyblahblah Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,985
    2,063
    Jan 14, 2013
    There should be a mandatory retirement age. Hopkins is by far the exception that proves the rule, and it would be better to miss out on his late career if it meant preventing diminished fighters from taking beatings and sustaining brain damage. But sadly mandatory retirement and pension plans won't happen unless a single governing body runs boxing. Even the most wonderfully philanthropic of promoters would rather make money from a boxer in poor health taking beatings than offer him a pension. As it is, if older boxers continue after they've shown they can no longer compete at their former level they should be matched soft. If Roy Jones wants to tour the world fighting lesser fighters, great, but he has no business being in the ring with Glowacki or elite cruiserweights. Maybe making 40+ fights and a bit of a seniors circuit would be more feasible than enforcing mandatory retirement.
     
  6. stiflers mum

    stiflers mum Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,520
    787
    Aug 9, 2005
    Obviously should be assessed by an independent doctor every 12 months once boxers turn 40. As someone pointed out though Katsidis should be forced to retire despite being younger than say Hopkins and Tarver.
     
  7. iestyn501

    iestyn501 The welsh scot gilford Full Member

    154
    0
    May 15, 2015
    i don't think it should be mandatory age limit but like someone said before should be vigorous tests at a certain age. A bit like when old people have 2 take driving tests, as some are really good at driving, while some need taken off the road.
     
  8. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Relationships are not my forte Full Member

    9,344
    9,097
    Jan 20, 2010
    This.
     
  9. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Relationships are not my forte Full Member

    9,344
    9,097
    Jan 20, 2010
    At what age should be made to retire?
     
  10. TinFoilHat

    TinFoilHat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,740
    403
    Sep 29, 2013
    I think the problem is more that corrupt commissions still think that guys slurring their speech and getting KO'd over and over are OK to be in a boxing ring still. We know commissions are corrupt. They let Martinez fight with no knees. They need a more stringent health check.
     
  11. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,143
    Apr 4, 2012
    I think we're going to see a 50 something champ some day, maybe down to juice but I think it's possible.
     
  12. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,538
    Mar 16, 2008
  13. Koba

    Koba Whimsical Inactivisist Full Member

    8,548
    96
    Apr 28, 2013
    Bernard, he say NO!
     
  14. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    May 31, 2012
    To tell someone who makes a living, pays his bills and supports his family off boxing. That he is too old to fight, even if he's fully capable to do so doesn't fit with me. It should be a base by base thing, and the truth is a younger fighter usually retires old pastime Fighters.
     
  15. Koba

    Koba Whimsical Inactivisist Full Member

    8,548
    96
    Apr 28, 2013
    And this ^. The problem of pensions and post career support is a perennial and worrysome one, massively complicated by the fractured nature of the governing and sanctioning bodies and the selfishness of promoters (and management) aiming to make a maximum return on fighters with a limited and unpredictable shelf life. The idea of a fighters' union has been repeatedly mooted but also seems doomed to failure, partly complicated by the highly individualistic nature of the sport and the massive disparities in earning power of the combatants.

    Ooops. Got carried away there! Yeah.... wot u said... :lol: