Should Vitali Klitschko pass on a title defense and simply retire?

He could retire but I think he should keep fighting, I don't see anyone in the division beating him.

 

If he's healthy and still has the ability, why retire? A true champ defends his title and there are a few interesting fights for him out there. If he doesn't plan to defend the title then he shouldn't hold it hostage.

 

He announced that more than likely he will fight on so he will not retire.Why?when he can beat mostly everybody?

 

No. Vitlai still has plenty left. He should fight on. Valuev, Lewis, or Toney is who I want to see him fight next.

 

:good Agree.

Get Valuev in the ring, unify his title with the WBA, then bow out.

It'd be such a shame to retire when he is so dominant over everyone else, even COLD and inactive, he's still head and shoulders above the rest.

Cash in a bit more on what he has left in the tank, get that last belt, then go out on top.

 

I want Vitlai to fight 3 more times. He can fight two more times in 2009, and once in 2010.

Get Valuev's belt.

Offer Lewis or Byrd a re-match, but take the Lewis match 1st if Lewis wants it.

Then fight one more time vs a name fighter.

Of coruse he would win all three matches.

Then he could retire at 39-2, with 38 KO'S!

 

He should offer Peter a rematch.

 

Hell no, he just owned Sam Peter, something his little brother couldnt do against a much younger and greener Sam Peter 3 years ago. Vitali has proved to me, and many others out there, he's still the best Heavyweight in the world.

 

Rubbish. For boxrec-jockeys perhaps, for anyone with a knowledge of boxing will remember Vitaly as a great fighter.

Wlad is a cheap copy (albeit the best outside of Vitaly).

 

OK, because the highlight of his career is getting his face shredded right? Wlad is atleast on the path of trying to bulid a resume.

 

WTF ??? After going through all the troubles of trying to get back into the ring in 4 years . . . suddenly retirement?

That move doesn't makes sense.