should we dumb down the sport?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by itsa, Jul 22, 2015.


  1. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Since nobody is a good enough fighter to defeat any Boxers anymore (Wlad, Ward, Mayweather), should we make it easier for lesser boxers who fight more wildly to have a shot?

    Ban Jabbing.

    Ban Footwork.

    Ban winnning?

    I think we should do this so there is an even playing field. it only seems right. for example if someone is backstepping and you are forward stepping you should get the win even if you are getting punched in the face. Also ban clinching, because in the natural world two men at fisticuffs never come to a clinch.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    No, just get rid of decisions in world title fights.
    Let them fight to a finish.

    That will make it much much harder for fraudulent fake matches to be passed of a world class fights.
     
  3. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,600
    40,212
    Aug 28, 2012
    Clinching is already a foul, because this is boxing, not wrestling. Boxing is a sport that emphasizes striking with fists. We don't use our feet either because it's not kickboxing. If you desire a more natural fight then you should watch UFC or National Geographic.

    There is already a rule that the referee is supposed to break up clinches and penalize holding, but it is rarely enforced. A change to the rule that stipulates a point should be deducted every five clinches or so would probably do the trick and is specific enough that a referee won't screw it up with his own interpretation.

    Also, who says those boxers haven't been beaten? Wlad got knocked out three times and Mayweather has some very controversial decisions on his record.
     
  4. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,568
    8,129
    Sep 2, 2011
    They should just do it like rockem sockem robots, stand in place and trade hooks.
     
  5. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    I agree, Lamont Brewster is clearly a better atg than wlad. Im agreeing we need to stop clinching and make it illegal. Even though every fighter clinched throughout history we need to stop it, you are right.
     
  6. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    exactly, who wants sklill? Boxing should be about handing a lesser opponent an easier way to win.
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Lots of fighters have been disqualified for clinching.
    Still not enough probably.

    In the old days, if fighters weren't fighting hard the referees would often just throw them both out of the ring and call it a "no contest".

    If the action is so tame and slow that's exactly what should be done.

    I think the FANS were better in those days though. These days fans don't even want to see a bit of violence. They prefer a few light slaps and no one gets hurt. :lol:
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    The most skilful will always win because they adapt to whatever rules are in place.
     
  9. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,600
    40,212
    Aug 28, 2012
    Fighters today clinch less than they did a century ago. Watch the old footage. Rule changes resulted in more jabbing, combinations, and less holding. This would continue that trend. The idea was to make boxing less like wrestling and to speed up the action to be more audience friendly.
     
  10. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    really? Great fighters like Jack Johnson, Benny Leanord,jack dempsey and Jim Corbett would never clinch!
     
  11. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,059
    Oct 25, 2006
    Fans were way better in the old days. You don't even see fights in the crowd anymore.
     
  12. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh!

    74,986
    42,636
    Sep 29, 2012
    Ban idiot trolls like you.
     
  13. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    No but I think the aggressor should be favoured instead of the runner which judges seem to favour today.
     
  14. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Are you going in
     
  15. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015

    as opposed to when?

    So you think moving forward and missing > moving back and landing?