** Should we eliminate the P4P list from boxing??**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Only one true P4P....SRR....
     
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    #16
  2. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    To much fanatism go into this subjective list!!
     
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    #17
  3. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    If you are admitting there can be a label for one P4P fighter in history, then you are admitting there can be a label for one P4P fighter at the present, too.

    Just use the same standards that came up with you thinking Sugar Ray Robinson is the #1 P4P (which 90% will agree with you).
     
    Nonito Smoak, Aug 24, 2014
    Nonito Smoak, Aug 24, 2014
    #18
  4. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    No, the term was created to described the greatness of SRR..les once it's been manipulated to create this subjective list....

    SRR was it alone as the P4P, it was not until the later it became a fad!!
     
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    #19
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    402,527
    84,423
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not stupid if Bradley's division is much better.

    Should, for instance, Manny Pacquiao or Carl Froch ( neither currently #1 in their division) be ranked behind Hekkie Budler simply because he is #1 in a weaker division?
     
    IntentionalButt, Aug 24, 2014
    IntentionalButt, Aug 24, 2014
    #20
  6. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    This is exactly why it should be eliminated, you guys are arguing about it!':patsch
     
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    Orishaman, Aug 24, 2014
    #21
  7. jim jim

    jim jim Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    4
    Jun 2, 2014
    yeah i mean its weaker but how can you actually gauge that one guy is like 5th best and the other guy is no1 but he other guys ahead and the no1 cant do anything about it, we could argue all day about who should be where and theres no real answer
     
    jim jim, Aug 24, 2014
    jim jim, Aug 24, 2014
    #22
  8. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,191
    5,408
    May 22, 2011
    Yeah, Mayweather has been on top too long, let's just do away with the dam thing and while we are at it , let's get rid of fighter of the year, decade etc. Hell, get rid of the belts too and fight of the year for that matter. It don't mean **** anyways.
     
    Manfred, Aug 24, 2014
    Manfred, Aug 24, 2014
    #23
  9. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    Exactly which fights had you seen of srr to say he is p4p best ????

    I would love to see some too.
     
    Staminakills, Aug 24, 2014
    Staminakills, Aug 24, 2014
    #24
  10. YCGS

    YCGS Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,067
    1,271
    Sep 13, 2013
    OK but Sergio Martinez was "the man" at 160... but the version Cotto beat wasn't even 50% of "the man" but we're supposed to believe Cotto is Lineal champ? No thanks, I'm smarter than that.
     
    YCGS, Aug 24, 2014
    YCGS, Aug 24, 2014
    #25
  11. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    In boxing history, this exact issue has happened many times...is part of boxing, a number of time this same set of events created some great historic rematches!!
    I am not saying Martinez v Cotto rematch would be historic since I think Sergio has nothing yo look for with Cotto....all I am saying is part of the sport!!
     
    Orishaman, Aug 25, 2014
    Orishaman, Aug 25, 2014
    #26
Page 2 of 2