should we stop refs scoring title fights

Absolutely. Here's what I posted on another forum:

Suggestion: In my view, last night’s awful verdict adds to a case for stipulating that title fights should be scored by three judges. ONE referee (or judge—remember the judge who thought Froch was winning!) may get things wrong, but there’s less of a chance that TWO of the three judges will get things wrong, and deliver an unjust verdict.

Question: When it’s clear that the vast majority feel a referee or judge has made an awful decision, what happens? In last night’s case, can the Board make O’Connor watch a tape of the fight and give his rationale for scoring the rounds the way he did? Or is no action ever taken?

 

yes let the ref, ref the figt and get the judges to judge the fight, but dont let dave parris be a judge!!

 

Or Michael Alexander :-(

He would score Calzaghe vs Lacy 115-114 to JC!

 

ref should concentrate on the rules not scoring.

 

4got bout that twat lol!:good

 

yes

 

thats the one :good

the kid now has a L on is record when it should be a W or NC

 

Definitely, there's no reason why they shouldn't use 3 judges and let the referee concentrate on doing his job.