Wlad vs Haye was a 12-0 dominant victory, with Haye being knocked DOWN. How is a knock down a draw? It wasn't bs too, Haye was clearly hurt and looked like he dived but truly was knocked down. End of story.
Okay, so we will start with the obvious. First off, you insulted me by suggesting that I "talk[ed] all the **** I want" against Haye, which I really didn't. I simply said he embarrassed himself, alluding to the toe defense. Second, after I suggested you "pack your lunch," and then quoted The Big Lebowski, which I don't think you got, you told me this was "no Klitschko **** gobbling contest." Next, Haye was the **** talker. This is not controversial, as I imagine everyone understands this. Vlad simply responded. Finally, Vlad can claim victory due to the fact that the unified rules of boxing establish a specific paradigm within which the contest is tried. Since both fighters signed a legal document recognizing their explicit responsibilities and expectations inside the ring on fight night we can all safely assume that Haye (as well as Vlad) understood the criteria the judges were hired to observe and accordingly score. Granted there were no knock downs, but any judge or observer that understands the unified rules of boxing (and not the back alley brawl aesthetics typically wished for by laymen observers) witnessed and comprehended a near-shutout for Klitschko. Thus, Haye lost and lost big in a fight short on fireworks yet filled with the obvious...
And No to the OP. Wlad dominated the stats, and boxing is about who lands the better punches, combos, and is the agressor. Wlad dominated in each round all those judging criteria, and thrwoing 3 powershots/rd aint gonna cut it to gain favor with the judges when your ducking and dodging and getting touched up for 2;45 seconds of every single round. Wlad UD with one Rd going to Haye for his flopping.