Showtime Crew: "Jacobs beating Quillin is better than anything on GGG Resume"

Murray and Lemieux >>> Quillin

 

...... Based on last night.

As you said, it isn't scientific.

It's sport, there are many variables. Hindsight is easy.

 

Look, I respect your opinion. You think Quillin got unlucky or that Jacobs is really good and he'd (Quillin I mean) beat those two guys still. I can't say nothing.

However, I have a different OPINION and guess what, this sport isn't objective, there's subjectivity involved and you have to accept that. You can't apply some scientific resume rating formula to everything.

 

It's a bit ironic considering how Kid Ovaltine did everything he could to avoid GGG.

 

That's fine and dandy and I don't necessarily disagree with this logic, I'm just stating the obvious. Bumlovkin doesn't get credit for fights he hasn't won. His alleged "higher level" status need to be proven in the ring. Until that happens, it's all speculation.

 

A little overconfident fella.

 

None of these fighters have an extensive resume. Jacob's and GGG is the best match up. Pretty well equal resumes and good power. Could be a good brawl. Quillin will be shaking in his boots with GGG.

 

I agree about the science. Obviously, unless they fight, we can't even say who would win with Quillin/Lemiuex/Murray. But I also feel that it's a bit of a trap to judge the value of a win based solely on that result. Of course it will reflect poorly on the loser.

Bottom line to me.... Jacobs TKO1 Quillin looks the best to me for any single win. Not by a significant amount, and not his resume as a whole, which isn't as good.

 

Getting dropped is part of this game armchair. He has only one loss and his chin wasn't supposed to hold up last night according to you and others drag queen. A long as you get up, that's all that matters. You speak the stupid **** that you just spoke above in front of a room full of boxers and they will smack the **** out of you for even opening your mouth.

 

GGG fans are strange, on one hand they say Quillin is a bum for not fighting GGG, but then exaggerate to the moon how good GGG's opponents are. So if you fought GGG = you're good but if you've never fought him = you're a bum. That's awful logic, in fact had David Lemieux not fought GGG then people would be saying, "Lemieux is a bum, wtf is Lemieux?" How can you hype Lemieux to the moon but not credit Jacobs when Lemieux basically didn't beat anybody good? His best win is probably N'Dam who ALSO lost to Quillen.

Then Jacobs destroyed Quillen and TKO'd him in one round but GGG fans won't give him credit, which is odd because all GGG fans talk about is GGG's power and how he finishes fights. But someone else at 160 dismantles a ranked opponent in a single round and it means nothing.

GGG fans tried to sell us on Lemieux because he hadn't lost in years, yet Jacobs hasn't lost since 2010, so if you hype David Lemieux then you have to hype Jacobs. Who was Lemieux's best win anyway?

 

Totally agree, if it was GGG who had blown Quillin out in under 2 mins they would be pumping Quillin up to no end, the same way they will if GGG fights Lee next who had a draw with Quillin.

 

A guy Quillin mopped the floor with...

 

Well, yeah. But it's the same with fanboys of any fighter. Zero objectivity.

 

Then I guess Jacobs should be ready to fight GGG next right? :think