SI Article on Wlad-Chagaev

I don't think so.

 

I'll post my other thread and ya'll can tell me WHY it's an intriguing fight.

 

What am I missing here? Race is an issue? Hayes social life is an issue? What?

 

But seriously, this mother ****er does NOT know boxing. It's about styles. And with Chagaev's superior "technical skills" cough bull****, he throws a ****in 1-2...anyway.....Haye is obviously the much more dangerous opponent.

Chagaev is a ****in walkover.

 

thank you for posting the article.

 

This thread is missing something.

 

The idiot who wrote this article confused Wlad's 11 beat-down of Thompson with Wlad's two-round obliteration of Ray Austin.

 

Apparently Wlad should just retire unless he can fight David Haye every 4 months, according to some people.

 

That was a poorly written article, aside from it's bias, it was filled with errors. Better cases, much better, have been made on this forum for Klitschko Chagaev being a good fight. I personally don't think it is, but if you want to argue the pro's don't use this article as an example.