Significance of amateur records?

Discussion in 'Boxing Training' started by jonfh1993, Apr 1, 2014.


  1. jonfh1993

    jonfh1993 New Member Full Member

    62
    0
    Mar 31, 2014
    I have heard from a few coaches that the first 15 or so amateur boxing fights don't bear a lot of significance to a boxer's ability/potential. How significant would you say a novice record is long term in a boxer's success? I have a record of 13/14 fights with about 3 wins. But I have still been told I can make it far in boxing.

    Also, can you think of any fighters who lost quite a few amateur fights at first but then went on to achieve great things in amateur/pro?

    Cheers then guys!
     
  2. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    I have heard Paddy Barnes lost his first 12 or so amateur fights, then went on to eventually win 2 Olympic Bronze Medals, European Gold and Silver and Commonwealth Gold Medal.
     
  3. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,551
    6,562
    Oct 18, 2009
    Think Johnny Nelsons amateur career was something like won 3 lost 10, then he lost 3 of his first 4 pro fights.

    Went on to hold the WBO Cruiserweight title for a good few years, made a tonne of defenses and was undefeated for the last 10 years of his career.
     
  4. RichC

    RichC Member Full Member

    488
    0
    May 15, 2011
    Lots of very good lads have losing records. Your record depends on who you box.

    At this stage, there is no reason to think you can't achieve great things in the future based on your record.
     
  5. jonfh1993

    jonfh1993 New Member Full Member

    62
    0
    Mar 31, 2014
    Yeah. I have been told by my coach that I will start winning most of my fights soon. I guess the first lot of fights are more like chances to learn than fights that bear any significance. Plus I box very good/experienced lads/
     
  6. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    16,150
    11
    Jan 14, 2011
    Rocky Marciano was 8-4 as an amateur.
     
  7. :deal

    Some guys are better suited to the pro rules too.
     
  8. jonfh1993

    jonfh1993 New Member Full Member

    62
    0
    Mar 31, 2014
    True. Look at that Librado Andrade who was like 2-14 as an amateur, made a half decent pro !
     
  9. There have been many examples of fighters who haven't had outstanding amateur careers but have gone on to bigger and better things as a pro. The amateurs suit slick boxers who can accurately land their punchers and accumulate points. But big punchers with lesser work-rates do better in the pros.
     
  10. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    43,950
    31,339
    Apr 17, 2011
    Anyone know about the required amount of fights to turn professional? :think

    I guess it varies from place to place but i can´t really find anything on it. A coach in London said you have to have/win (i fail to remember which one) 10 amateur bouts.
     
  11. jonfh1993

    jonfh1993 New Member Full Member

    62
    0
    Mar 31, 2014
    Well I saw a video of a pro called Frank Buglioni saying that to turn pro you should have had at least 40 fights. Some turn pro sooner, some turn later. It varies person to person though. You shouldn't turn pro too soon though, as this has ruined a lot of potential star's careers.

    As for what your coach said, he probably meant you have to HAD at least 10 bouts.
     
  12. 10cent

    10cent New Member Full Member

    2
    0
    Oct 29, 2013
    It depends who you fight. My son is 14 and started fighting when he was 13 and 85 lbs which is small around where we live. it was hard to get him fights so we took fights with heavier guys and who were open fighter just so he could fight. He only fought a fighter with 6 fights and beat him. His record now is 1 and 5. All the losses are to open fighters with years of boxing.
     
  13. jasper2005

    jasper2005 Active Member Full Member

    920
    2
    Jun 8, 2012
    There is no required amount of amateur fights needed to go pro
     
  14. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    Hopkins recently attributed his longevity (in part) to his short amateur career. All that hard training, fighting, and sparring puts miles on you.

    You can also learn a bad set of habits/fight pacing as an amateur.

    As far as your record, it doesn't matter as much as your accomplishments. If you're placing high in tournaments, your name gets out there. Nobody cares about your record.
     
  15. sugar_boy

    sugar_boy New Member Full Member

    88
    0
    Jun 28, 2010
    Off the top of my head, you have Joe Calzache. Lost a large number of his first 20 fights. Henry Armstrong suffered 2 knockouts in his first 4 fights (as far as I remember). He's widely held today as one of the finest fighters to have ever lived. Another great example is Teofilo Stevenson. This was a man who lost about 14 out of his first 20 fights. In his words "I got tired of losing." I guess he just started focusing more on what he was being taught and didn't get disheartened. He went on to be one of the greatest amateurs off all time, winning 3 Olympic gold medals and destroyed almost everyone he met from 1972 to about 1980.

    Presevere my friend. Some people are just late bloomers. You've shown determination so far and this can only serve you well in the future. Start looking at some of the things that you're doing wrong. These may could be the primary reason for losing a fight. Ask your coach for an honest view of what really needs improving at the moment. Once you know, PRACTISE! PRACTISE! PRACTISE! Hard work and dedication - these two things will take you far in any walk of life and in boxing they're absolutely essential. Good luck pal and hope all goes well ;)