Scoring quite lopsided in favor of Alcine....I don't think they saw the same fight I did, but I can see the scoring ending up in Alcine's favor.
Alcine by unanimous decision. It was decent match that I thought clearly went to Alcine but you never know eh?
Simms hurt his hand in the 2nd round. I still think he outboxed him for the first half of the fight +....but what are ya gonna do.
Take That Biaised Punk ! Connecticut Judges + Connecticut Referee... = Alcine Deserve This, Fans Chanting !!!!!!!!
Biased punk? You didnt even watch the fight. The ref wasnt from Conn. The judges werent from Conn. Be for real. Im gonna have to say your just a tad biased. Again, I still feel he won the first half + easily. Dont know what to say. It was still a boring ass fight.
It was definitely close enough for Alcine to win, just not by the margins two of the judges had it. Even I said myself that a few of the rounds were real close, two of which I gave to Simms and one I gave to Alcine.
I DID NOT WATCH THE FIGHT ? HOW COME I KNOW THAT GUY JUTRAS HAD IT 116-110 ALCINE AND THAT THE FRENCH COMMENTATOR HAD IT THE EXACT SAME WAY ? I AM FROM MONTREAL QUEBEC CANADA AND WE GOT EVERY ****ING FIGHT LIVE HERE !!!!!! SIMMS CLINCH ALL NIGHT, BYE BYE !!!!! SRC CANAL, WE PAY 0$ TO SEE ALCINE BEING A CHAMPION, NEXT IS LUCIAN BUTE !
No idea, but why did you think it was a conn. ref and conn. judges when NONE of them were from there? That my friend is being biased.
