Simple question for British non-khan fans/haters.

Having respect for him and being a fan are two different things.
You are normally a fan of people you like, personality and talent combined. Khan has talent but his personality is the problem.

If he did have those wins people would have to respect it, if you didn't you're just being bitter and twisted about it in my opinion.

As for being a fan, no, Khan has said too many delusional, disrespectful and contradictory things.

 

I agreed with you for a lot of that but when you said Brook brings nothing more than previous guys, I have to disagree. Brook is a world champ and they are both at the same level now. Khan may have done it over a longer period of time but that makes no difference as they are of similar quality now.

 

Like 90% of the boxers today then.

Not sure how you can be similar quality if the quality you have been fighting is terrible.

 

Its a fraud when the best opponent khan will have faced in his career would be kell brook if they faced. So much for ELITE opponents.
Such a farce. Danny garcia wasn't elite when they fought, he was still an up and comer.. No way was peterson elite? You can even argue the guy wasn't even world class. Maidana was a raw argentine and world rated ofcourse but he wasn't elite. Judah was shot, nuff said.
All these top opposition khan and his fans have said he's faced are no where to be seen on his record..

 

Alexander is terrible? No, the only poor fighter he has faced recently is Molina, Collazo was okay, Algieri is okay and same for Diaz. It is widely considered that both Brook and Khan are world class, just because you have a dislike towards him doesn't mean he is not a good fighter.

 

So saying Peterson beat the sh!t out of khan(which he did) is now racist?

 

No did I say that was racist? You have made many racist comments before which I have singled out, the only point I made in this thread is, that the thread starter only wanted non Khan fans/Haters, that's why I said you shouldn't really comment on the thread seeing as you are the most anti Khan 'person' on here, and that is why I didn't make a comment regarding the thread topic as I am a Khan fan.

 

Are you special?

As you said the thread is for non khan fans and haters and I'm not a fan of khan.

So that entitles me to add my piece in here and explain what would change my view on him.

Just because I'm anti khan doesn't mean it is fixed. If khan starts fighting credible opponents and stops using dumb excuses to avoid fights like ramasham etc, then I will start giving him credit.

You on the otherhand as a khan fanboy shouldn't be posting in here

 

Are you special? The thread says Non Khan fans/ haters. Therefore the thread starter doesn't want Khan fans or Khan haters posting in here and just the neutral boxing fan posting in here. I am not a Khan fanboy, I am a fan but I am reasonable in my view of him unlike some others on here, who think he is the best on the planet. As I am a Khan fan I didn't make comment on the thread topic, instead just said that you should be posting your opinions in a thread which excludes you from posting within it.

 

if your Auntie had nuts would she be your Uncle and would you buy him a birthday card?

 

Hilarious isn't it!
He's been mixing it up before then at the lighter weight and I never said he beat everyone I said he provided good entertainment, he's been in a lot of good fights. He's experienced at the level.

I don't think Brook brings anything more than Maidana, Peterson, Garcia, Alexander as I said he experienced at the level.

 

people really seem to struggle to get their heads around the fact that close fights can't be robberies.

 

you may wanna consider that the next time you try to single froch out for criticism.