Simple reason why PACQUIAO s RESUME is way better then MAYWEATHERS!

JCC? You must be on something bro, Mayweather has fought great fighters, but his image distorts his credit. He fought Corales and de la hoya. He technically out classed these bigger guys. I'll agree that he hasnt fought good fights lately other than the one on saturday

 

Not necessarily. Some people might assume you're on roids based on the way you're built. I'm sure there are a lot of people who think Bob Sapp is on roids. He is in fact a shitty MMA fighter. Also, one can be judged on just one performance. For example, if a guy moves up one weight class and brutally knocks out a tomato can, he could still be accused of juicing. It's not necessarily based on his entire resume.

 

Yawn. Bad thread.

 

good point

 

Sorry, Mayweather just fought Mosley, he was #3 pound for pound, someone Roach did not want Pac to fight, or else they would have fought him instead of Cotto.:deal

I am not trying to bash Pac, but some credit must be given to Mayweather.

 

hes winding you up

hes not that ****ing stupid or he wouldnt be able to use a computer

 

Yeah, and Roach is on video pretty much saying that they have been selecting Pac's opponents because he knew the fighters had declined and were not what they once were. So what's your point?

At least Floyd Sr doesn't make interviews saying he knew Mayweather would win because he thinks the other guy is shot.

 

Pac has the better resume for defo.

 

Bad thread but I agree that Pac's resume is better than PBF. Most boxing writers and analysts would also agree with you that Pac's resume is better than PBF, thus, no need to rub it in the face of the *****s.

 

Is this a /b/ raid?

 

The losses and questionable decisions in Pacquaio's career makes it a worse resume in my view.

 

I think Pac's resume is overrated, i like him as a fighter, i think he is great but in my opinion I don't think he is in the top 20, I have heard people calling him top 10.

 

The one simple reason why Pacquiao's resume is better than Mayweather's is because no-one has accused Mayweather of taking steriods?...I'm confused. :huh (I actually think Pacquiao's resume is slightly better than Mayweather's)

So Pacquiao's resume is better than every other greats resume in history who hasn't been accused of taking steriods? atsch

 

True. Pacman's resume is better. That's why I have Pac in my Top15 of all time, and Mayweather in the Top20.

Pacquiao: Morales x2, Barrera x2, Marquez, Larios, Diaz, De la Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey.

Mayweather: G. Hernandez, Corrales, Castillo x2, Judah, De la Hoya, Hatton, Marquez, Mosley

Pacman has better wins because of his weight jumping. However, he also has loses and questionable decisions.

 

atsch