Greenock's gritty and talented John Simpson defends his Commonwealth featherweight title against Manchester's tall and capable Steve Bell on the Khan-Salita bill in Newcastle tomorrow night (December 5). The 26-year-old Simpson, one of best domestic scrappers in British boxing and also one of the best 'away' scrappers, won the title from Middlesbrough's lanky and previously unbeaten Paul Truscott in Middlesbrough earlier this year and proved his right to the title with a 10-round stoppage of the same man a fight later, again in Middlesbrough (Truscott was down). Simpson gave Liverpool's Derry Matthews hell in Liverpool, was robbed in Hereford against Hereford's Dazzo Williams, hammered Londoner Ryan Barrett in London, and won the British featherweight title from "house" fighter Andy Morris in London in 2007 with a cuts stoppage (caused by a sharp combination), a title he lost on a close and controversial 12-round decision to fellow Scot Paul Appleby at Glasgow's historic Kelvin Hall last year. He came back against Truscott. To me Simpson is cleverer and harder-hitting than Bell, who likes to think he is a puncher when he is not, although the challenger takes a good shot and can box. A former double ABA featherweight champion and England boxing captain at the 2002 Commonwealth Games (where he lost 18-15 to Canada's Benoit Gaudet in the featherweight quarter-finals), Bell will need to stick to his boxing against the busy Simpson, who would love to drag Bell into a tear-up; Bell is no spring chicken at 34 and rather one-paced, in my opinion - he lacks the ability to change gears as he showed when he bossed and even floored Femi Fehintola early in a 10-rounder for the English super-featherweight title in 2007 but allowed the Yorkshireman to outhustle him from the later rounds and to nick the verdict. It is the furthest Bell has ever travelled, by the way; Simpson has completed the 12-round course five times. In all fairness, Fehintola is the only man to beat Bell in 19 outings and the latter, who moonlights pretty successfully as an actor (he's appeared in Hollyoaks and Emmerdale), has reeled off six wins since to earn this shot. Despite Bell's recent form and amateur pedigree, it is Simpson who has boxed at a higher level as a pro, hits more sharply and boasts the greater stamina. He is also much more comfortable at the weight; Bell has never got down to featherweight as a six-year pro and stands 5ft 10ins (as tall as Rocky Marciano). I can see Simpson outpunching his opponent on the way to a late stoppage.
Its such a tough one this. Simpson may have a bit too much ferocity for Bell at this stage but Bells career as a pro has been largely wasted. Bit torn on this one as I like both fighters but I'm Simpson has to be my favourite fighter at the moment. Simpson W12 but it will be close.
Don't think he'll stop Bell mate, Bell is a better fighter then Truscott overall. I'd say close points dec.
Prob Simpson on points, although he is getting better all the time so you never know he may stop Bell
Simpson's become a proper little machine lately, and is going to be tough for anyone to beat. Should be a good one this (hope Sky gives it air time!), but I think Simpson wins it.
I've got Simpson winning by late stoppage in this, it could be a really good fight. Simpson is like a fine wine, he keeps getting better with age.
HAHAHAHA Bells a step down from Truscott, weres this big step up in class Simpson was suppost to be moving up in ? fighting Bell is a step down.
Bell was a very decent amateur but when Jamie McKeever is your best win as a pro then you really are in trouble. I just think that Simpson will have way too much for him
I think he'll stop Bell in round 10, but i wouldn't be surprised if it went the distance. You are right Top Dog, Simpson is getting better all the time. I think it says a lot for John's mental strength that he has went through so much bull**** in his career but is still going strong!:bbb