Since when did the WBO become a legit world title??? THEY SUCK

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pugilistspecialist, Dec 7, 2009.


  1. PopeJackson

    PopeJackson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,615
    3
    Dec 8, 2007
    All the alphabet belts are meaningless but the WBO is especially a joke. Bunch of shitty Euro fighters.
     
  2. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    i think the lack of champs makes it better the don't force fights, fighters have to man uo and make the fight.They do need to sort out the fact you can sit on a title maybe not mandos maybe you just have to fight a top 10 ranked contendor
     
  3. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Calderon, Lopez, Marquez, Bradley, Pacquiao, Pavlik - yeah, just a bunch of shitty Euros.
     
  4. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    Yeah that American based outfit have a lot of credibility. :lol:

    http://www.usatoday.com/sports/boxing/2004-02-20-ibf-sentence_x.htm
     
  5. Joe Collins IBO

    Joe Collins IBO Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Jan 19, 2009
    The IBO have sanctioned much higher quality fights over November and December, the WBO sanctioned the next best followed by WBC, IBF and then the WBA whose averaged challenger was ranked at number 61.
    Yes you are right it is a tough struggle, details of our fees are clear on the website.
     
  6. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    4,387
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
  7. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Wbogus has always been a joke when Tyson was undisputed some obscure fighter held that POS title.

    Boxing has been ruined by all the alphabets belts as well as HBO and Ring Magazine. There was a time when being the champ meant something, it is now meaningless, all you see nowadays are hypejobs avoiding each other and mostly taking fights against no hopers that favor them. Having Multiple belts has made being Undisputed very hard when you consider the BS the Alphabet bodies put fighters through as a result, You have a lot of Divisions where the best don't fight the best.
     
  8. SoxNation

    SoxNation Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    0
    Oct 21, 2009
    What makes the ring belt meaningful, and you do know there is no such thing as a p4p champ right?
     
  9. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    But then it loses a credible claim to define the linear champion.
     
  10. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    yeah ur right there i still think its the best belt and rankings.Those Kilts really ****ed things up whats the problem with fighting a sibling i know people who would take pleasure in it
     
  11. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    calzaghe didnt bring any credibility to it...he fought the worst of the worst for 5 years with that **** title
     
  12. pugilist64

    pugilist64 Guest

    Whereas the legend Hopkins with the BIG middlweight title FOUGHT..................a bunch of nobodies. :hi:
     
  13. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    i have no prob with your statement either :good
    its bad enough calzaghe fought mario veit 2 times
    Hopkins fought robert allen 3 times
     
  14. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007