Sit Down Earnie Shavers ... Deontay Wilder is the best puncher the division has ever produced

You mean like Luis Ortiz, Tyson Fury, Dominic Breazeale, Luis Ortiz, Tyson Fury and Tyson Fury back to back?

You mean like those half dozen fights in a row? Three with the World Champ?

If someone fought Luis Ortiz (Who is ranked in the top 10 by every sanctioning body and Ring right now) and Tyson Fury (the world Champ) in their next five fights RIGHT NOW ... is anyone giving them crap about it?



If Michael Hunter fought Luis Ortiz twice and Tyson Fury three times in his next five outings ... instead of fighting the slugs he's been facing like Sean Laughry, Mike Wilson and Jerry Forrest ... are people badmouthing Hunter?

Just because Anthony Joshua and others don't rematch unless they lose, some of you guys seem to think fighting the BEST guy over and over is somehow worse than fighting a handful of lesser fighters.

Would it have been better if Ali had fought Frazier three times in row for the World Title in 1971? Or was it better than he fought Frazier, then Jimmy Ellis, then Buster Mathis that year?

I think three fights with Frazier for the world title in a row probably would've been better. I probably could've done without Ali-Ellis and Ali-Mathis.

 

How many times did Charlo drop Castano in their fight again? Twice?

 

Ducking? Mike Tyson's career has been over for nearly 20 years. Deontay Wilder's career isn't over yet and his opponents' careers aren't over yet.

I don't know who his top five wins will be. He isn't finished yet.

Get your head out of your ass.

 

You can't complain about Wilder's competition .... and in the next breath say he "should've" fought lower ranked guys than Fury instead ... and that would've been more impressive.

Honestly, I can't help you if you think fighting the BEST fighter in the sport of boxing Tyson Fury THREE TIMES is a negative and it would be better if he fought the best once ... and then fought, say, the fourth or seventh guys in the other two.

It's always better to fight the best.

Would it be more impressive, in your next three fights, to meet Canelo three times ... or, instead fight Canelo once, Andrade once and Plant once?

It's more impressive fighting Canelo three times.

IF we were talking about anyone other than Wilder, I doubt you'd ever say something so stupid.

In his last half dozen fights, Wilder has fought the best fighter in boxing THREE TIMES and a fighter currently rated in the top 10 by every org and Ring TWICE.

No one in the entire division has fought that level of competition over the last three years.

Fighting guys rated LOWER than Fury wouldn't have been better.

Again, get your head out of your ass. Your hatred of Wilder is nonsensical.

 

That video clip from the amateurs was so long ago Anthony Joshua and Joseph Parker hadn't fought their first amateur fights yet and Usyk was coming off losses the previous 12 months or so to SHAWN PORTER and Beterbiev.

Shawn Porter.

The fact some idiots feel the need to keep trotting a video a couple decades old shows they've got nothing to add to any current discussion. That's why I have them on Ignore. (Trust me, you don't miss anything by doing so.)

The only blemishes on Wilder's record came against the best fighter in the game who has 40 pounds on him.

Guys like Shavers lost to the mediocre 190-pounder Bob Stallings and nobody cares. Wilder loses to the 280-pound World Champ Fury (who he dropped four times), and they act like that shows he can't punch.


Wilder is the hardest puncher the division has produced.

Hate blinds.