Sitting here watching Canelo Trout and thinking....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nay_Sayer, Aug 25, 2013.


  1. Undisputed

    Undisputed Cant G no other way Full Member

    6,482
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    154 OUT OF 769 FOR TROUT. 124 OUT OF 431 FOR ALVAREZ.

    So trout had to throw 300 more punches to land 30 more than canelo, thirty more punches which no one remembers cause none of them cut ,stunned or dropped canelo. Everyone remembers trout getting dropped, everyone remembers trout being stunned on numerous occasions, everyone remembers trout making canelo look like god damn sweet pea, and last but not least everyone remembers TROUT HIMSELF ADMITTING DEFEAT TO THE BETTER MAN.


    The only thing trout brought to the table that gave canelo any type of trouble was his stance.End of.
     
  2. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    well what i remember is that after the sixth round the fight was at best even and the most dominant round to that point was the sixth when canelo was against the ropes.

    and trout admitted losing immeditaely after the fight because he knew, as like most handicappers, that he would have to fight the perfect fight to win on the cards. the knockdown eliminated that.

    without the knockdown, are you telling me that canelo clearly won?

    because in my opinion, without the knockdown, trout has a case for being robbed as the punchstats favored austin.

    go to intentionalbutts rbr thread for this fight.

    after the sixth round, it was like 10-2 in favor of trout(i didnt not partake in this).

    for the record, i thought canelo did better than he would have as i thought trout would outland alvarez by 40-60 punches.

    it doesnt matter, canelo is not going to have a long career with 10-ounce gloves.
     
  3. twenty1

    twenty1 Final Destruction Full Member

    3,191
    0
    Jun 2, 2007

    Boy, I know you got hate in you. I know you do. HATE HATE HATE.


    But....."haters gon' hate"


    And where is your career?
     
  4. Undisputed

    Undisputed Cant G no other way Full Member

    6,482
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    Quincy is passed being biased against canelo.Its just pure hate.
     
  5. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    how is it "pure hate" when i say that canelo did better than i thought he would have against trout and that i believed that the decision could have gone either way? all the showtime commentators scored it a one point victory for canelo, a draw or a trout win.

    the real hate is the people that thought austin got robbed and that canelo did not win the fight.

    when i mention the fact that canelos 5'7" height, short legs, bad footwork and lack of one punch power is a recipe for a brief career in a division of ten ounce gloves i am pointing out historical and statistical facts.

    canelo would do great at 147.

    hes not going to do well at 154+.

    thats not "pure hate."

    thats just fact.