Size doesn't matter, just because DLH beat him, Canelo won't

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anglosaxon, May 30, 2013.


  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    when your own flesh and blood can't even lie, you know it was a huge robbery.
     
  2. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Anglo is an ATG and posters should be respecting his astute observations.
     
  3. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    i wanna hear your explanation about how Pacs KO loss vs Marquez was debatable hahaha that is some bonkers **** duko
     
  4. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    You type like you spend too much time arguing on the internet
     
  5. #1Rounder

    #1Rounder Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,581
    56
    Jul 22, 2008
    This is the smartest thing anyone has said in this thread!!!!!:deal
     
  6. pecho26

    pecho26 ESB Lurker Full Member

    2,334
    16
    Nov 19, 2010
    Then who the hell should he fight??
    I mean this board went ballistic when it was a no fight against canelo,now that he is fighting him its a cherry pick and a mismatch.:lol:
     
  7. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Read the thread and you'd find out.

    Only a few *****'s spammed about Canelo and a few Floyd haters, one lot because he is an easy win, the other lot because Floyd is a coward and its funny to highlight it. Noway does a barely out of teens with no world class experience, lead feet, slow, moderate power and terrible stamina is the best opponent for the far taller Floyd.

    This is like *****'s justifying Guerrero '' but he's fatter than Floyd and ranked'':patsch:patsch
     
  8. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Canelo beat Trout, who many considered the best 154lber and beat Cotto more convinvingly than Floyd, withe little controversy and question. He looked like he was trained by the Mayweather's and looked more defensive than even Trout. And Trout is a big 154lber bigger than Canelo. Only thing hurting Canelo right now is his stamina. Other than that he can hang with Floyd.
     
  9. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    So Trout beating a completely shot to pieces ruined Cotto means what?

    Trout beat Canelo anyway. Plus, Canelo being a plodding counter puncher is exactly what Floyd loves, he knows the offence will be inadequate, no workrate and he can dance around him pot shotting him as he looks down on the flat footed midget. I can't believe you would list a strong point for Canelo being that he is defensively minded.:patsch

    Cotto that fought Pac would kill Trout and Canelo on the same night.
     
  10. duwdu

    duwdu Member Full Member

    279
    0
    Jun 28, 2010
    Oscar himself admitted, wisely, that he clearly lost the record-breaking/setting fight with Floyd. He said so after getting to watch the fight himself shortly afterwards.

    Moreover, he's ever since been constantly trying to give and rationalize, in his own view, the main reasons he lost the fight - such as him abandoning his jab.

    Me myself, just like the immediate posts-fight discussion panel did, I was wondering which fight Larry Merchant was watching and commentating on, when he quipped that Oscar won the fight.

    See? OP? It never pays to be a d.ouche....you end up shooting yourself in the foot.

    P34c3
     
  11. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Oscar is humble and was moving towards promoting, he gets more money building up Floyd. Floyds own flesh and blood elucidated that it was one of the worst robberies Floyds been in since Castillo.

    Merchant is one of the most respected faces in boxing his opinion has a little more sway than a forumite who is a *****.:patsch
     
  12. duwdu

    duwdu Member Full Member

    279
    0
    Jun 28, 2010

    You can be as uncouth as you like, it does not change the fact that you're a d.ouche bag. To your lousy opinion/excuse that Oscar was being humble, I say Floyd Snr was being petty at the time to his son, since he largely trained Oscar then to, in a way, get the better of his own son, but failed woefully.

    So you can't turn around to use Snr's views of the outcome of the fight in a rational way. Because if Snr had admitted that Oscar lost, it would have meant that he did a poor job training Oscar for the fight. It would also mean he had been humiliated by his own son - and by his own archenemy, his son's mother.

    I wasn't expecting you to take my opinion over that of LM the drunkard, I was drawing your wavy attention to the opinions - unanimous by the way - of three experts assembled by HBO to watch and give final comments on the fight. Theirs shredded that of the singular, biased as sh.it drunkard. But you're too ignorant and hateful to be able to view things that way.

    And guess what? Floyd Snr now has his mojo back with his son, and he's been boastful about it even pre Guerrero. You go and ask him again for his opinion on the outcome of Oscar vs Floyd.

    P34c3
     
  13. ashl3y72

    ashl3y72 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,135
    54
    Jul 4, 2012
    who else he gonna fight
     
  14. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    What a load of duwdo.
     
  15. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Your inane fabricated perversion of the facts don't negative the overwhelming opinion that ODLh beat Floyd.

    Once again another ***** who uses ad hominem and decides to focus on ODLH than the topic which is how woeful Canelo is!

    Floyd SNR was brutally honest about Hatton, he didn't have an ''agenda'' and conflict of interests there. Floyd SNR was suited and gave his professional sober opinion which was objective, articulate and correct.

    Larry Merchant is not just a face of boxing but the most respected commentator/analysis in boxing. He voiced the wide range of views that Floyd lost and it wasn't a shut out due to ODLH gassing due to his age.

    A judge gave it to ODLH, so did Floyds own flesh and blood as did the most highly regarded analyser in boxing. A disgruntled paranoid sociopath forumite disagrees with them.