Size matters. A discussion on classic vs modern heavyweights.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Shake, Aug 12, 2007.


  1. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    55
    May 4, 2007
    I'll put forth the argument in its simplest form.

    The race of man is continually growing larger. Because of that, boxers at heavyweight are bigger now, both on average and extremes. There have been many successful big heavyweights who've used their size-advantage in the past -- however, there is a larger pool of big men to produce boxers from currently.

    Does Rocky Marciano stand a chance against a Lennox Lewis? Against a Wladimir Klitschko?

    The question I ask is -- is it possible the champions of yore are at a disadvantage when facing modern fighters because heavyweight prizefighters are now much more physically imposing, and despite any technical advantages and intangibles in the favor of the classics, they are simply physically overmatched?

    Two points I put up for debate.

    1) The 6'5-6'11 range of fighters are more skilled now than they were in the past.
    2) Does it feel uncomfortable to anyone that a great champion in his time might lose to a lesser modern boxer head-to-head simply because he was born in a 'bigger' era? It does to me.

    My personal opinion is that I'd give men like Wladimir Klitschko and Lennox Lewis a lot of grudging wins over fighters I love purely because they are so much more physically imposing, all the while I firmly believe they'd easily lose if both fighters were the same size.
     
  2. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    Of course not.
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    One way to deal with that discomforting thought is to remember that if those fighters were fighting today, most of them would be a few inches taller and/or bulkier themselves due to the advances in nutrition and training.

    I'm not saying prior methods are outdated by any means, but the best trainers can take all that worked and build on that. I think a trainer combining what worked from the earlier eras of boxing combined with a specialized routine of plyometrics and olympic-style weightlifting could make those "classic" fighters just as effective today.
     
  4. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    Strange how a thread about immensize and skill does not mention the massive and highly skilled Tye Fields.

    What, is this man not skilled enough for you people?
     
  5. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Is it posible to make your self grow in hight? If so how?
     
  6. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    1) If you go into a time capsule fight, your size changes. The dutch have done a study on this and they are on average, 6" taller than they were 50 years ago! Marciano today would be about 6'3" and weigh about 230 Lbs. I think the modern day Rocky would do just fine.

    2) Tyson did just fine while he was properly managed

    3) Ali won his first championship 2/25/64. On 4/22/95 George Foreman defened his IBF title for the last time. In their only bout Ali beat Foreman in 74'. The direct championship lineage of Ali lasted more than thirty-one years!!!!!!!!

    JR Head
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    As Evisceration already pointed out, the foods we eat every day naturally take care of that (I'm referring to the nation as a whole). Our diets today have more protein, vitamins, and minerals- so it's not too much of a stretch that somebody growing up as a child in the 70's will be more likely to be bigger than someone raised in the 20's or 30's.

    There are exceptions of course- guys like Max Baer and Primo Carnera, for example- but a smaller guy like Marciano would be more likely to be larger if he were growing up today or 20 years ago as opposed to when he did because on average, people are bigger now for that very reason.
     
  8. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Thanks thats a good explaintion and answer to my question. I thought that you were saying one could take supliments to make them grow but what I think your saying is that the natural progresion in nuturtion has made us grow taller as a spicies in genral.
    Another question. How much taller and biger would some of these now small heaveyweights if they were around today?
     
  9. Mrboogie23

    Mrboogie23 what the?? Full Member

    2,853
    98
    Jul 20, 2004
    good answers in general. I agree, advancements in training, nutrition etc would make the fighters of yesteryear also bigger. Because humankind in general is bigger. Give some of the great fighters of yesteryear more size and they'd do fine.
     
  10. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    That's cause the heavies are the only division with unlimited size. So that's obviously the only division that it CAN apply to. :blood
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,009
    Jun 30, 2005
    In the past, smaller men (sub-160 pounds) managed to beat heavyweights, so presumably there are still smaller men out there (cruisers and lightheavies--not junior middleweights!) who could take on modern ones and win. I see nothing absurd about picking Foreman over (for instance) Klitschko...especially since he actually beat Moorer and Briggs as a grandfather.

    Part of it has to do with glove sizes and round limits as well--longer fights and smaller gloves tend to favor slightly smaller, fitter men.
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,338
    Jun 29, 2007
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  13. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,681
    3,504
    Jul 10, 2005
    Yes a MERE 5 pounds parts one divison from other lol. That 5 pound weight thing relly helps you know. :lol:

    We have WAY too many divisons. The reason they did that was because it makes more money when you had champions. Than they make more money when they part the titles in 2s or 3s or even 4s. lol.

    I say we go back to 8 weight divsion. 17 is pushing it.
     
  14. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    That's a joke, right?

    Floyd was a great fighter, no doubt but Ali owned him. No disgrace in that for Floyd at all, he did better than 99% of the current crop would have done against a peak Ali/Clay.
     
  15. JJ

    JJ Active Member Full Member

    986
    0
    Nov 13, 2004
    I think it is WAY too easy to say that if they got the right training and food, they would clean out the division.
    How much speed would they loose when big?
    How would their chins be against the monsters of today?
    Could all of them learn all of todays training?

    Taking Mayweather and magnifying him makes as much sense...