SKY SPORTS ARE MISSING

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by moog, Mar 26, 2023.


  1. Trafford

    Trafford Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,834
    Sep 29, 2018
    This content is protected


    33,000 viewers for Okolie vs Light. 59,000 across all channels and platforms
     
    SeanB1, KermitTheFrog and DramaShow like this.
  2. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,696
    4,775
    Jul 6, 2014
    It is a peculiar stable they seem to have.

    Eubank was the one they were banking on and Smith just battered him.

    Not sure where the next big fight is. Brook would want silly money to fight Smith
     
  3. tee_birch

    tee_birch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,696
    4,775
    Jul 6, 2014
    That is shockingly bad. I tip my hat to the 59K fans who watched, they must really love the sport as the fight was a shocker
     
    SeanB1 and im sparticus like this.
  4. Craigt93

    Craigt93 Member Full Member

    276
    381
    Oct 15, 2020
    Wouldn’t be surprised if Sky pull out of boxing probably this year. Will be break clauses in the Boxxer contract.

    Probably just show US shows which they can get very cheaply.

    Very telling that they haven’t replaced Adam Smith or even put an interim in charge.

    I’d hate to see BT and DAZN numbers too. Imagine they’re both smaller than Sky’s.
     
  5. nurological

    nurological Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,387
    10,500
    May 25, 2012
    I wouldn't mind Sky or any of the others pulling out of boxing as that would be we can get the UK talent more condensed which will improve TV cards overall
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.
  6. Norsemen

    Norsemen New Member Full Member

    21
    19
    Feb 26, 2022
    I organised a triathlon that was televised on Ch4 with replays on Sky and Eurosport a week later. This was 10 years ago.

    Ch4 screened it at 6:40am and we got 200k views.
    Sky was 40k across all channels, replays and on-demand over (I think) 2 weeks.
    Eurosport was 2-4k and they repeated it a lot.

    I thought it might be interesting in the context of above. The production company spent around 18k producing it. I've no idea whether it was successful for all parties as we didnt organise it again. It was cool, but eyeballs on our event didn't lead to a huge uplift in entries and at this time, sponsors weren't fussed about TV as we were in recession.
     
  7. KermitTheFrog

    KermitTheFrog The people doing the banning are idiots Full Member

    2,046
    2,040
    Sep 5, 2012
    The only reason they’ve stuck with it is for the Sky Box Office money. Hard to see where they’re gonna get much of that any time soon.
     
  8. Astro

    Astro Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    3,813
    Sep 29, 2021
    Going forward, I seriously hope that boxing will be given high priority by Sky.

    Competition is healthy and it's good for the boxers. Some of them make way too much money compared to their real worth.
     
    SeanB1 and Bfcad like this.
  9. Bob Flaps

    Bob Flaps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,021
    5,648
    Mar 30, 2019
    They need to fill hours of content across channels and boxing does that pretty well. I think they probably overpay for it compared to other things like lower league / Scottish football for example, but filling the schedule has always been part of the job.
     
  10. ZiggerZagger

    ZiggerZagger Active Member Full Member

    848
    541
    Mar 13, 2012
    About 1/3 the number of views a similar length IFL interview with Eddie gets.
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  11. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,095
    Sep 21, 2013
    That has to sting! Shalom has no idea what he's doing. Eubank is mid 30's and punted like he's a prospect (and got stopped), Okolie is the most boring boxer on earth, and other cast offs from Matchroom won't cut it. Sky need Ed and vice versa.
     
  12. Trafford

    Trafford Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,834
    Sep 29, 2018
    They overpay significantly. They also increased the budget significantly and the viewership has declined. I think they will see out the 4 year contract with Ben and then review their position. Previously the PPV income paid for the boxing content put out by Matchroom so effectively Sky didnt actually pay for the content. Now they are really limited with the PPV offering and it will be on Ben to build a PPV star by the 4th year of his contract or sign one.

    Seems like the money is going into Azim
     
    SeanB1 likes this.
  13. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,236
    12,616
    Mar 26, 2009

    Sky needs to decide between maximising viewing figures and popularity vs virtue signalling / lazy matchmaking.

    Women’s boxing matches stuffed onto men’s boxing cards to pad them out turns all boxing fans off. You see more action outside a kebab shop on a Saturday night than in most women’s “boxing matches”. They don’t even “fight” in 3 minute rounds.

    If a young boys first experience of boxing is watching Lawrence Okolie fight then he isn’t ever watching boxing ever again.

    Some commercial nous here is required from those signing the cheques. It isn’t difficult. Many of us here could do a much better job. Just put on exciting fights between evenly skilled fighters. I actually think sky sports had it right around the early 2000’s with its standard Saturday night cards
     
  14. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,236
    12,616
    Mar 26, 2009
    Imagine that. Putting on 50/50 fights between boxers of domestic and above level.

    They better not do it too often, they might actually increase the viewing figures for boxing.