on the contrary. When PBF fought Hatton, I bet on PBF in large part because i knew the brits were skewing the odds.
sorry i don't get it. if the odds are artificially low on Pacman, then they are artificially high on Oscar. This is how it works
Oscar is down to -165 to win. That is a smart bet. And instead of betting Oscar to win by KO or TKO, which is currently +140, take a look at the under. Right now, you can get under 9.5 rounds for +165. I think that's a smart bet. I find it hard to believe this fight will go to the cards.
Oscar has always has a hard time landing flush on those smaller, faster fighters and Pac's defense is seriously underrated. I think Pac has more chances of winning then getting KTFO although I am a little worried that Roach will be quick on the trigger with the towel if Pac has a bad round.
It's a pick'em between a DLH UD or KO. That's why the odds are so close. KO is at +145 and UD is at +160. I would not be shocked if the first hard punch DLH lands puts Pacman to sleep in the 1st. Nor would i be shocked if DLH wins a close UD.
I think it was on sportsbook. So offshore. Unfortunately, I'm in Cleveland so Vegas can't seem further away right now.