Smigga - Ward, down graded

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Silent_Service, May 14, 2015.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Silent_Service

    Silent_Service Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,736
    7
    Aug 25, 2014
    Just been having a look through Boxrec & see the fight is no longer listed as a title fight, and no longer states the rounds it's over,

    At a catch weight of 172... Hhhhm what's peoples thoughts on this, I think it's a lose lose for Smith now it's a non title fight.

    Do well (like in AA fight) and people are not going to look at him as a voluntary defence, no more world shots

    Get blown away, and he's been had off in a non title fight... Lose lose
     
    Silent_Service, May 14, 2015
    Silent_Service, May 14, 2015
    #1
  2. Blobby Nelson

    Blobby Nelson Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,533
    1
    May 13, 2015
    172? Smith is a small SMW as it is. If Ward puts it on him it is over in 4.
     
    Blobby Nelson, May 14, 2015
    Blobby Nelson, May 14, 2015
    #2
  3. thurmanthegoat1

    thurmanthegoat1 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,707
    477
    Sep 15, 2014
    It's a rubbish fight
     
    thurmanthegoat1, May 14, 2015
    thurmanthegoat1, May 14, 2015
    #3
  4. Southpawology

    Southpawology Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,288
    272
    Dec 16, 2013
    It was never a title fight?
     
    Southpawology, May 14, 2015
    Southpawology, May 14, 2015
    #4
  5. Southpawology

    Southpawology Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,288
    272
    Dec 16, 2013
    Possibly the WBA super-Interim catch-weight regular silver belt?

    Would anyone b surprised? :rofl

    These r the only type of big fights Paul Smith can out of bed for these days yanno
     
    Southpawology, May 14, 2015
    Southpawology, May 14, 2015
    #5
  6. Golden_Child

    Golden_Child Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,965
    6
    Aug 26, 2014
    I think doing well or as well as can be done against Ward will be a good thing for him, champions will take him as a voluntary because they can say he's been in big fights and done ok/good in them whilst knowing he probably isn't good enough to beat anyone at world level
     
    Golden_Child, May 14, 2015
    Golden_Child, May 14, 2015
    #6
  7. Silent_Service

    Silent_Service Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,736
    7
    Aug 25, 2014
    Nah it was defo listed as a title fight , WBA super world Super mid title- 1000% sure they had it listed as such!

    Nah I disagree, I think if he does ok others will see him as a dark horse, that there's too much risk..
     
    Silent_Service, May 14, 2015
    Silent_Service, May 14, 2015
    #7
  8. antonio plaisir

    antonio plaisir the detonator Full Member

    7,061
    3
    Nov 30, 2012
    can it even be a smw title fight at a catchweight within lhw limits? i know wba have bent over backwards in stretching their rules in order to accommodate ward, but this would be pushing it, surely?
     
    antonio plaisir, May 14, 2015
    antonio plaisir, May 14, 2015
    #8
  9. I Shot JR

    I Shot JR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,651
    1,798
    Feb 17, 2012
    Complete joke that Ward is allowed to fight at 172- I'm not sure what fighting Smith who isn't exactly huge at 168 achieves bar an easy win.

    Does Ward want to move up to 175 after this fight? If so, why?
     
    I Shot JR, May 14, 2015
    I Shot JR, May 14, 2015
    #9
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,376
    Nov 30, 2006
    It was always catchweight non-title.
     
    IntentionalButt, May 14, 2015
    IntentionalButt, May 14, 2015
    #10
  11. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,657
    29,570
    Jan 18, 2010
    The weird thing is that the WBA stripped Froch recently for being inactive, and at the same time were giving Ward a pass for being even more inactive and fighting his next fight at 172.
    Well actually it would be weirder if the WBA made sense for once.
     
    Robney, May 14, 2015
    Robney, May 14, 2015
    #11
  12. Blobby Nelson

    Blobby Nelson Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,533
    1
    May 13, 2015
    You'd have a point if it wasn't for the fact that Froch has clearly sucked a rematch with Ward.
     
    Blobby Nelson, May 14, 2015
    Blobby Nelson, May 14, 2015
    #12
  13. spurs ben316

    spurs ben316 Active Member Full Member

    1,076
    1
    Nov 24, 2013
    Kovalev and or stevens
     
    spurs ben316, May 14, 2015
    spurs ben316, May 14, 2015
    #13
  14. antonio plaisir

    antonio plaisir the detonator Full Member

    7,061
    3
    Nov 30, 2012
    hey, don't forget mandating the fight then disappearing purse bids because ward really didn't fancy an awayday at the city ground!
     
    antonio plaisir, May 14, 2015
    antonio plaisir, May 14, 2015
    #14
  15. boxfanlut

    boxfanlut Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,672
    7
    Apr 4, 2012

    Why shouldn't he be allowed to fight at 172? Why is it a complete joke?
     
    boxfanlut, May 14, 2015
    boxfanlut, May 14, 2015
    #15
Page 1 of 2