So, according to Canelo, even if he loses to Trout, he should get Floyd?

*****s is wierd

 

I'm not roach, you fool.

 

Damned if you do, damned if you don't, Canelo gets smack from haters whether he fights Trout or not.

 

:rofl

 

Well something like that has happened before in Floyd's career, with the Judah/Baldomir situation. If that had gone according to plan, Mayweather-Judah would have been a super fight for the undisputed title and Floyd would have probably fought Shane in november 2006, certainly not Baldomir. **** happens lol

 

Maybe he expects to win?

 

lmao.

 

well, in all fairness, his title defenses have been perpetrated on awarding his fights to the loser of matches as oppposed to the winners so to canelo, this obviously makes sense(molina/cintron; lara/kirkland) to him.

 

It's only logical and reasonable for him to secure some money. As long as he fights Trout, I'm happy.

 

LMAO!!! Too funny!! But why the need to create an alt just to troll??? You could troll all you want under your own user name.

 

He wants to fight the P4P king RIGHT NOW you idiot, and instead of sitting out the time until Floyd makes up his mind, he's willing to take on a high risk low reward fight - and you're still bitching about Canelo?

Then again, damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

Sorry, that last post of mine was supposed to be a reply to Roach. I'm still getting used to this windows phone.

 

You responded with that on the wrong account, you ****ing idiot

 

Get banned moron.