So, according to Canelo, even if he loses to Trout, he should get Floyd?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mamerto, Jan 25, 2013.


  1. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    But, but he lost 15 pounds of muscle in the poky. You know how doing 1000 sit ups a day makes you waste away to nothing. :yep
     
  2. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    TYpical anti-Canelo ***** thread (op is known for that).

    It's obvious that Canelo has no problem fighting Trout so this ain't sitting well with all the haters who claimed Canelo was ducking.

    Clear and Obvious agenda:deal
     
  3. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    like i said, that remains to be seen.

    imo, canelo alvarez is a poor mans version of tommy morrison because he doesnt possess the dukes one punch left hook power. same plodding footwork and bad defense. he landed 360+ punches agaisnt mosely and shane still only threw 16 less punches than saul in the championship rounds.

    shane, as diminshed as he is, threw over 200 punches in rounds 10-12.

    all i could think of when alvarez left his seat at msg after trout *****-slapped him in front of 100s of thousands of people was the bully thinking to himself,

    "you mean trout isnt afraid of me?"

    no saul, no legit 154 is afraid of you.

    what kind of person beats up a guy 5'3" and 108 pounds?
     
  4. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    While I believe it is mainly GBP shielding him he does bear some responsibility for this AND he isn't signed to fight Trout YET.
     
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    :good
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    props to him if he fights trout.
     
  7. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Who cares. His foil is Mayweather. People will come to see him. Did Marquez bring people out to the fights pre-Mayweather? JMM had never cracked $1m in a fight before FMJ. No, it isn't Mexican independence day you jack. Press the issue too. :hey

    Mosley won a fight. What had he sold you dolt? Guerrero just crushed Berto who went life and death with Ortiz. Mexicans in the place seemed to love Guerrero. I know. I was there. FMJ fights on Cinco De Mayo. So what? If that sells, who cares? The fact is, he sells fights.

    Now we are back talking about ducking? Please. Maybe if Margarito hadn't spent his time losing to Williams, barely beating Clottey, and cheating resulting in a suspension maybe he too could have gotten his clock cleaned. I guess FMJ ducked Pac too? :roll:

    Your are speculating. If we use history as a guide, FMJ will be fine with damned near any solid opponent. Showing YDKSAB, it isn't about what we think. It is about where Guerrero has positioned himself. FMJ is a WW. FMJ wants to fight. Who do you suggest at weight he fight?

    Right, you are probably going to suggest a 160 pounder. Will you *******s ever disappear? :bart
     
  8. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    agreed.

    but on the face of it this is sad.

    were giving "props" for a wbc champion to fight a wba champion.

    thats how sad the canelo circus has become.

    are we going to give "props" to trout for fighting canelo?

    seriously...sad.

    but whats even more sad is if canelo doesnt fight trout and well still have idiots here somehow justifying how canelo is not the biggest ***** in boxing.

    some will even come up with "torch" theories.

    http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?p=14519425#post14519425

    good ****ing grief.
     
  9. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    This content is protected

    :-(
     
  10. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    uh, no rebuttal with cognizant, debatable facts?

    the caption and taunting emoticon is a typical response by a canelo nuthugger.

    since you dont realize it, you just *****-slapped yourself and stuck your shoe up your own ass to people with iq's over 100.
     
  11. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    canelo vs trout up on boxrec now.
     
  12. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010

    Facts?

    Posting history proves one of us has an obsession with Canelo and it ain't me. FACT:deal
     
  13. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    will one of these ***gots throw something other than a jab?
     
  14. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008

    the only obsession i have is kicking the **** out of canelo backers such as yourself who tend to be the most irrational, loudest, irreverent and gutless people on this forum.

    how about you take me up on a lifetime esb ban bet that canelo doesnt beat three top five boxrec.com jmws before suffering a loss?

    now you understand what i mean about gutless, right?

    because we already know that youre irrational, loud and irreverant not to mention irrelevant.

    yeah.

    thats what i thought.
     
  15. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    The irony:lol:

    Take it easy tough guy!