So Amir Khan is the same age and has 3 more fights then Devon Alexander, So why...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by darryl1914, May 14, 2010.

  1. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    25,227
    Likes Received:
    27
    He has absoutely no chin. Obvious answer.
     
  2. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    39,748
    Likes Received:
    3
    IT'S HIS FIRST (or was) FIGHT IN AMERICA FOR **** SAKE!

    Why won't you acknowledge this?! Let the lad get his feet settled under the table. A Paulie fight was a very smart fight, as it gave his promoters (as well as his trainer) a measuring stick as to how far he is in the process of fighting the Alexanders and the Bradleys. Now judging by last nights performance, we can safely say he's going in the right direction, and is about 70% there.

    The American fans will find out if he's the real deal or not, when he's made his attempt at conquering the 140 division!
     
  3. pablogad

    pablogad Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    0

    Hee Hee:D
     
  4. pablogad

    pablogad Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like your honesty in the last sentence of your post; I'd also like to see Khan's defense/chin tested, whichever way you want to look at it.

    I totally agreed with your view point on Bradley up until yesterday. However I read elsewhere (BScene) that Bradley's reluctance to fight Alexander centered on building the fight into a megafight and the money. Purportedly he's only being offered $150k to take this fight, which sounds like peanuts to me. Bradley went on to say that he'd fight if the money's right (although I have no idea what this figure might be).

    One
     
  5. smokin_joe

    smokin_joe Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would of is not the same as did.