So basically Floyd and Pac's 154 belts are meaningless

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by janeschicken, Dec 2, 2012.


  1. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Cotto would still beat the other belt holders in Canelo and K9, so no that doesn't make it worthless.
     
  2. 777ike

    777ike Active Member Full Member

    826
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
    manny has never made the super-welterwieght weight limit and floyd needs to defend his title..
     
  3. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    he beat dlh for a 154 belt too though
     
  4. raichu

    raichu Guest

    Last time i checked, mayweather won his two belts at jww as a legit ww. No catchweight nonsense.

    Floyds is legit

    Pacs catchweights aint legit
     
  5. EuroBot

    EuroBot Guest

    Actually, he wouldn't. Floyd is the WBA 'super' champ at 154. Trout is only the 'regular' champ. So really Floyd is the true champion of the WBA.
     
  6. locard

    locard Boxing Addict banned

    4,937
    9
    Nov 6, 2011
    Floyd hasn't beat a real 154lbr yet so yeah, he's a fake champion

    Cotto's career and belt at 154lbs was pretty much meaningless too since he got it by fighting shot to **** and damaged fighters

    Both Floyd and Cotto are a fraud at smw and would get trounced like punks by a real, in shape top fighter of the division like Trout
     
  7. 777ike

    777ike Active Member Full Member

    826
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
    manny faught oscar at 147. And he weighed 146 when they gave pacquiao margarito's super welterweight title. that's illegal bro, boxing's all politics nowadays..
     
  8. 777ike

    777ike Active Member Full Member

    826
    0
    Apr 17, 2010
    but if floyd can defeat trout and canelo, he'd be the greatest.. and manny.. and im just dreamin though..
     
  9. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    How is Floyd's belt that he won against Cotto legit if Cotto is too small for 154?

    :huh
     
  10. Slickstar

    Slickstar Crisp This Full Member

    7,094
    5
    Apr 27, 2011
    He won two belts at two different occasions in the 154 weight division. It's funny how Floyd is the center of your thread, but you made sure to include manny's name to appear neutral. manny won a vacant 154 belt under some shady catchweight circumstances against an unranked. You're not fooling anyone, girl
     
  11. Silver

    Silver The Champ is Here Full Member

    5,382
    404
    Jul 16, 2005
    who ever told you they did mean anything? maybe mayweather and pacquiao worshippers
     
  12. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    If that's your reasoning then Floyd doesn't have a belt at 154. Cotto faced Marg at 151, defending his title but since he wasn't at 154 he really wasn't defending a title. That sounds like bull**** to me.
     
  13. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Floyd beat 2 reigning champs at 154.

    Pacquiao beat a welterweight who never won a belt at he weight.


    Bit different midget boy
     
  14. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Cotto won his belt against foreman dope. Oscar won his against Mayorga and never really lost at the weight getting jobbed against Mosly and thumping Vargas


    Floyd is a legit belt holder. Pac won a farce.
     
  15. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Alvarez beats Mayweather & Trout on the same night.
    (H2H Canelo has credit now... Like a 2009 Floyd)