So basically Floyd and Pac's 154 belts are meaningless

This. *******s are a ****ing disgrace. :rofl

 

Mich... Read my post...I said he "defended" his title at 151 against Tony. Using the knuckle heads rationale, I stated that it really didn't make Cotto a "real" champ at Jr Middle Weight.

For the record I feel Cotto was a good, solid 154 champ...a little small but he could knock out a few corners in this division. But at some point the lack of size can be the deciding factor which is what we saw this Saturday against Trout.

Foreman was the champ.... Cotto beat him for the belt...But that's not really helping your cause to add credibility to Cotto as a 154 lb champ.:rofl

Floyd beat DLH before he retired.....when Floyd came back he wasn't champ anymore. He beat COTTO to become champ which is the topic of discussion...How credible was Miguel as the "champ" using the logic of the guy who I was replying to?

Once again...I give Floyd full credit....but I just wanted to point out the complete and utter nonsense the other guy was posting about with regards to "Catch Weights". PAC won a title at 154 that's on par with the one Floyd won against Cotto.

 

I agree....but so are *****'s.

 

It's almost over bro... :good

 

Let's hope......But you know they'll replaced them with another.

 

******* and Canelotard talking about irrational fandom. atsch:rofl

And damn straight Floyd will be replaced. #SlickBlack

 

No, it was at 153. And you're not using the same rationale since Cotto actually beat a legit junior middleweight title holder to win his belt. Defending at a catchweight ≠ demanding a catchweight as a challenger.

 

Correct

 

How is Pacquiao winning a vacant bull**** title beating a guy not even at the weight a guy who lost to Daniel santos as his only notable fight in the the same as Floyd beating an established 154lb champ who beat 2 fighters at the weight.


Not even close *******. Floyds 2nd title at 154 isnt great not even good, but its real. Unlike Pacs fake strap.


Or are you *******s still countin Pacweights as legit championships? :rofl

 

umm i was talking about floyd.

 

that is funny too. He's trying to "appear" to be in the middle, but obviously he's not

 

It's a title even though it was vacated knuckle! So is Cotto established at 154 because he beat Yuri Foreman for the vacated strap? Or because Cotto defended the strap he won from Yuri at a catch weight? I don't have problems with Catch weights...it gets fights made between quality fighters who are from different divisions. I gave SRL credit for winning his title at a catch weight, why not PAC?

Floyd's first title at 154 was definitely quality! He beat DLH and I give him all the credit in the world over PAC's title at 154...but the most recent one Floyd got from Miguel is on PAR with PACs who he got from Marg when the title was vacant.

*****.

 

Belt wasn't vacant; Foreman won it from Santos and there's a lineage that extends back over 10 years. Keep trying to equivocate.

 

What this little ****** always does. One poster called his ass on it, just because he tries to sound intelligent doesnt mean anyone with any sense can tell hes full of it

 

He's a dope